Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

C++ Institute CPP Exam - Topic 9 Question 91 Discussion

What happens when you attempt to compile and run the following code?#include #include #include #include using namespace std;templatestruct Out {ostream & out;Out(ostream & o): out(o){}void operator() (const T & val ) { out
B) 4 3 5 2 6 7 11 9 8 10
A) 3 2 4 1 5 6 10 8 7 9
C) 9 7 8 10 6 5 1 4 2 3
D) 10 8 9 11 7 6 2 5 3 4
E) compilation error

C++ Institute CPP Exam - Topic 9 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for C++ Institute's CPP exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 9
[All CPP Questions]

What happens when you attempt to compile and run the following code?

#include

#include

#include

#include

using namespace std;

templatestruct Out {

ostream & out;

Out(ostream & o): out(o){}

void operator() (const T & val ) { out<

int main() {

int t[]={3,2,4,1,5,6,10,8,7,9};

vector v1(t, t+10);

for_each(v1.begin(), v1.end(), bind1st(plus(), 1));

for_each(v1.rbegin(), v1.rend(), Out(cout));cout<

return 0;

}

Program outputs:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Stefany
8 months ago
I'm surprised it works with reverse iterators like that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
9 months ago
Definitely not a compilation error, so E is wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
9 months ago
Wait, does it really use bind1st? That's kinda old school!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
9 months ago
I think the output is actually option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
9 months ago
The code compiles fine!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
9 months ago
I’m leaning towards option B, but I’m not entirely confident about how the `plus()` works with `bind1st`.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
10 months ago
I feel like the output will be the original array reversed, but I might be mixing it up with another example we did.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
10 months ago
I remember something similar from practice where we used `for_each`, but I can't recall how `bind1st` affects the values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamala
10 months ago
I think the code should compile fine since it uses standard libraries, but I'm not sure about the output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the use of `bind1st` and the custom `Out` functor. I'll need to review those concepts before I can determine the correct output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
10 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The code creates a vector `v1` and then modifies each element by adding 1 using `for_each` and `bind1st`. Then it prints the elements in reverse order using another `for_each` and a custom functor `Out`. I think the answer is B, but I'll double-check my work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrinne
10 months ago
Hmm, the code uses some advanced C++ features like templates, functors, and the `for_each` algorithm. I'll need to make sure I understand how those work before I can confidently answer this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
10 months ago
This looks like a tricky C++ question. I'll need to carefully read through the code and understand what's happening step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
10 months ago
This looks straightforward. The code increments each element of the vector by 1, then prints the elements in reverse order. The answer is clearly B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I know amplitude and frequency are important, but I'm drawing a blank on the other critical factor. Let me think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
10 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. We need to create the ZFS file system with the specified options, so I'll focus on getting the command structure correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
10 months ago
If I recall correctly, last week we practiced a question about sources for crime statistics, and the FBI was the answer. But for homicide and suicide, maybe it's different?
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
1 year ago
The correct answer is B) 0 1. The for_each loop adds 1 to each element, so the vector becomes 4 3 5 2 6 1 11 9 8 10. Then the reversed for_each loop prints these elements, but the last element is printed as 0 because it's out of range.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
1 year ago
This code is like a game of 'Guess the Output' - you never know what you're going to get!
upvoted 0 times
Daren
1 year ago
C) 1 0
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
1 year ago
B) 0 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
1 year ago
A) 0 0
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mozell
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. The code looks a bit complex, but I'd guess the output is 1 1, since the for_each loop is adding 1 to each element and then the reversed for_each is printing 1 for each element.
upvoted 0 times
Ocie
1 year ago
I agree, the code adds 1 to each element and then prints 1 for each element in reverse.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
1 year ago
I think it will output 1 1 as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rebecka
1 year ago
I think the output will be 4 3 5 2 6 1 10 8 7 9. The for_each function is adding 1 to each element, and then the reversed for_each is printing the elements.
upvoted 0 times
Noble
1 year ago
D) 1 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
1 year ago
C) 1 0
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
1 year ago
B) 0 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
1 year ago
A) 0 0
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dulce
1 year ago
The code seems to be adding 1 to each element of the vector and then printing them in reverse order. So the output should be 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1.
upvoted 0 times
Annmarie
1 year ago
User2
upvoted 0 times
...
Lura
1 year ago
User1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marti
1 year ago
I'm not sure about the output, but I think it might be 0 1 because of the way the bind1st function is being called.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
1 year ago
I agree with Franklyn, the bind1st function is not correctly used, so the output should be 0 0.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
1 year ago
I think the program will output 0 0 because the bind1st function is not correctly used.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel