Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

C++ Institute CPP Exam - Topic 8 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for C++ Institute's CPP exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 8
[All CPP Questions]

What happens when you attempt to compile and run the following code?

#include

#include

#include

using namespace std;

templatestruct Out {

ostream & out;

Out(ostream & o): out(o){}

void operator() (const T & val ) { out<

int main() {

int t1[]={3,2,4,1,5};

int t2[]={5,6,8,2,1};

vector v1(10);

sort(t1, t1+5);

sort(t2, t2+5);

set_union(t1,t1+5,t2,t2+5,v1.begin());

for_each(v1.begin(), v1.end(), Out(cout));cout<

return 0;

}

Program outputs:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: E

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Krystal
5 months ago
Definitely not a compilation error, so E is wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
5 months ago
Wait, why are there two 1s? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
5 months ago
I think it should be option D, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
6 months ago
It outputs 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 8.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
6 months ago
The code compiles fine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
6 months ago
I feel like the output might be option D, but I can't recall if the vector gets filled with zeros after the unique elements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the vector size. Will it actually hold all the unique elements from both arrays?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
6 months ago
I remember something about `set_union` needing a sorted range, so I guess it should work with the sorted arrays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
7 months ago
I think the code should compile fine since all the included libraries are correct, but I'm not sure about the output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
7 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'll just need to carefully read through the code and the output options to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the use of the `Out` struct. I'll need to make sure I understand how that's being used to print the vector elements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
7 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The code is sorting two arrays, then using set_union to combine them into a vector. I'll need to pay close attention to the order of the elements in the final output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
7 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully trace the logic of the code to figure out what's happening.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
7 months ago
Ah, I see what's going on now. The key is understanding how `set_union` works and how it handles duplicate elements. I think I've got this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. Are the switches using Layer 3 protocols to eliminate collisions? Or do the ports themselves act as independent collision domains? I'll have to review my notes to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
7 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I think I can handle it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
7 months ago
I'm leaning towards the configure terminal action, but I honestly can't recall if that's the right approach for overriding events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
11 months ago
Option E? Seriously? The only error here is the person who wrote this exam question. They must have been coding in COBOL or something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
11 months ago
Option D? Really? That's just nonsense. This code is clearly working correctly, and the output should be option A or B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
11 months ago
Haha, option C is a good one! The code must be broken if it's printing the elements in reverse order. Maybe the programmer is a time traveler.
upvoted 0 times
Lavonna
10 months ago
User1: Or maybe they wanted to test our attention to detail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
11 months ago
User3: It could be a logical error causing the reverse order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
11 months ago
User2: Maybe the programmer made a mistake in the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
11 months ago
User1: Yeah, option C is pretty funny.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimberely
12 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. The set_union function should return the unique elements from both arrays, and the output seems to be in the correct order.
upvoted 0 times
Eleonora
10 months ago
Looks like the code is working fine then. Option B it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
11 months ago
Yes, I agree. The set_union function should return unique elements in order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
11 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lacey
12 months ago
The output should be option A. The set_union function correctly merges the two sorted arrays and stores the result in the vector v1.
upvoted 0 times
Candida
10 months ago
E) compilation error
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
11 months ago
The output is correct because set_union merges the sorted arrays t1 and t2 into v1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
11 months ago
A) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arthur
1 year ago
I'm not sure about the syntax error, but I think the output should be A) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 because the code is sorting and merging two arrays into a vector.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
1 year ago
I agree with Kiera, the code is missing a semicolon after 'ostream & out'. So, the correct answer should be E) compilation error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
1 year ago
I think the answer is E) compilation error because there seems to be a syntax error in the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
1 year ago
But the code is sorting and merging arrays, so I think it's E.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynna
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
1 year ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel