Haha, leave it to Benton to come up with the simplest explanation. But you know, I'm not so sure. I feel like I need to go back and review the Schannel process again before I can confidently choose an answer.
You guys are really overthinking this, aren't you? It's clearly option A. The ProxySG establishes an Schannel when the client sends an NTLM type 2 message. That's the whole point of the Schannel, right?
Nah, I don't think that's right. If the client request fails IWA authentication, the ProxySG would need to establish an Schannel to handle the fallback authentication process. So, I'm leaning towards option C.
Wait, I'm not so sure about that. Didn't we learn that the ProxySG establishes an Schannel when a client request is first received? I think option B might be the correct answer here.
I agree, option D seems like the most likely answer. The ProxySG needs to establish an Schannel to handle the NTLM type 3 message, which contains the client's authentication credentials.
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'm not entirely sure about the correct answer, but I think it might be option D. The ProxySG should establish an Schannel when the client sends an NTLM type 3 message, right?
Dahlia
5 months agoEzekiel
6 months agoRuth
6 months agoTennie
6 months agoEzekiel
6 months agoVallie
6 months agoTimothy
7 months agoShawnee
7 months agoYolando
7 months agoRegenia
8 months agoBenton
8 months agoStephania
8 months agoDeandrea
8 months agoRhea
8 months agoMerissa
8 months agoDelmy
7 months agoAdolph
7 months ago