Broadcom Exam 250-428 Topic 3 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Broadcom's 250-428 exam

Question #: 83
Topic #: 3

You have just started a relayout operation in a live test environment, and you want to limit the impact of your work on concurrent testing activities. You also want to accommodate the need to constrain a relayout job's performance impact on concurrent activities.

What would you do to perform this task?

AUse the 'set iodelay' option of vxtask to throttle the VxVM task.

BUse the 'set iowait' option of vxtask to throttle the VxVM task.

CUse the 'set slow' option of vxtask to throttle the VxVM task.

DUse the 'set nice' option of vxtask to throttle the VxVM task.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Margart at Apr 08, 2024, 08:43 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 250-428 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Fannie

5 months ago

Using the 'set nice' option in option D) could also help in managing the task's impact on concurrent activities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reita

5 months ago

I think option B) might be a good alternative as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Oren

5 months ago

I'm not sure, maybe option C) would also work to constrain the performance impact.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tracie

5 months ago

I agree, using the 'set iodelay' option would help in limiting the impact of the operation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dulce

6 months ago

I think option A) is the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tracey

6 months ago

I would personally go with option B) and use the 'set iowait' to throttle the VxVM task, as I think it would be more effective in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tegan

6 months ago

I believe option C) could also be a good choice, as using the 'set slow' option might help in constraining the performance impact.

upvoted 0 times

...

Filiberto

7 months ago

I agree with Mitsue, option A) seems like the best choice to limit the impact on concurrent activities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

7 months ago

I think I would go with option A) and use the 'set iodelay' to throttle the VxVM task.

upvoted 0 times

...

Letha

8 months ago

You know, this question reminds me of that time I accidentally ran a relayout operation in production and took down the entire system. Good times, good times.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrie

8 months ago

I don't know, the 'set nice' option seems like it could be a good compromise. It would allow the VxVM task to run, but with a lower priority than other tasks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audria

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm not convinced. What about the 'set slow' option? That might be a more straightforward way to throttle the VxVM task.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristal

8 months ago

I'm not sure about that. The 'set iowait' option might be a better choice, as it would allow us to control the amount of time the VxVM task waits for I/O operations to complete.

upvoted 0 times

Murray

7 months ago

User 3

upvoted 0 times

...

Chaya

7 months ago

User 2

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenneth

7 months ago

User 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Linn

8 months ago

I think the 'set iodelay' option of vxtask sounds like the best approach. It would allow us to throttle the VxVM task and reduce its impact on other activities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delsie

8 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky question. We need to find a way to limit the impact of the relayout operation on concurrent testing activities, while still accommodating the need to constrain the performance impact on those activities.

upvoted 0 times

...