Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Broadcom Exam 250-428 Topic 3 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Broadcom's 250-428 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 3
[All 250-428 Questions]

Which option is unavailable in the Symantec Endpoint Protection console to run a command on the group menu item?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Margart at Apr 08, 2024, 08:43 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 250-428 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Fannie
9 months ago
Using the 'set nice' option in option D) could also help in managing the task's impact on concurrent activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
9 months ago
I think option B) might be a good alternative as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
9 months ago
I'm not sure, maybe option C) would also work to constrain the performance impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
9 months ago
I agree, using the 'set iodelay' option would help in limiting the impact of the operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
10 months ago
I think option A) is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
10 months ago
I would personally go with option B) and use the 'set iowait' to throttle the VxVM task, as I think it would be more effective in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
10 months ago
I believe option C) could also be a good choice, as using the 'set slow' option might help in constraining the performance impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
11 months ago
I agree with Mitsue, option A) seems like the best choice to limit the impact on concurrent activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
11 months ago
I think I would go with option A) and use the 'set iodelay' to throttle the VxVM task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
1 years ago
You know, this question reminds me of that time I accidentally ran a relayout operation in production and took down the entire system. Good times, good times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
1 years ago
I don't know, the 'set nice' option seems like it could be a good compromise. It would allow the VxVM task to run, but with a lower priority than other tasks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
1 years ago
Hmm, I'm not convinced. What about the 'set slow' option? That might be a more straightforward way to throttle the VxVM task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
1 years ago
I'm not sure about that. The 'set iowait' option might be a better choice, as it would allow us to control the amount of time the VxVM task waits for I/O operations to complete.
upvoted 0 times
Murray
11 months ago
User 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
11 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
11 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linn
1 years ago
I think the 'set iodelay' option of vxtask sounds like the best approach. It would allow us to throttle the VxVM task and reduce its impact on other activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
1 years ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky question. We need to find a way to limit the impact of the relayout operation on concurrent testing activities, while still accommodating the need to constrain the performance impact on those activities.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel