New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Blue Prism Exam ASDEV01 Topic 3 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blue Prism's ASDEV01 exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 3
[All ASDEV01 Questions]

Blue Prism Processes can be built across multiple workspaces - broken up into individual tasks, that each sit on their own Pages What name is given to this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

This is the correct name given to the practice of building Blue Prism processes across multiple workspaces and pages. It allows the developer to organize and reuse the logic in a modular way. The other options are either incorrect or describe different aspects of Blue Prism. Reference: https://bpdocs.blueprism.com/bp-6-10/en-us/helpDebug.htm?TocPath=Interface%7CStudio%7CProcess%20studio%7C_____7 (page 1)


Contribute your Thoughts:

Denae
2 months ago
Circular Path, huh? Sounds like a never-ending journey of bureaucratic nightmares. I'll stick with Layering of Logic, where at least I can get off the hamster wheel.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
2 months ago
Linking? What is this, a dating app? Layering of Logic is the way to go, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Felicidad
19 days ago
Definitely not. Linking is more about connecting different elements, not organizing tasks in Blue Prism.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
1 months ago
Circular Path and Linear Diagram don't sound like the right options for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
1 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It helps break down tasks into individual pages for better organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
1 months ago
I think Layering of Logic is the correct term for building Blue Prism Processes across multiple workspaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vallie
2 months ago
Linear Diagram? Nah, that doesn't capture the complex, multi-workspace nature of Blue Prism Processes. Gotta be Layering of Logic.
upvoted 0 times
Jarod
1 months ago
Definitely, Linear Diagram wouldn't do justice to the complexity of Blue Prism Processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luann
1 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It's all about breaking tasks into individual pages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
2 months ago
I think it's Layering of Logic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chara
2 months ago
Circular Path? Really? That just sounds like a recipe for confusion. I'm going with Layering of Logic as well.
upvoted 0 times
Marylou
2 months ago
Linear Diagram might work too, but I can see how Circular Path could lead to confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
2 months ago
I think breaking up processes into individual tasks on separate Pages is a good idea. Layering of Logic makes sense for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
2 months ago
I agree, Circular Path does sound confusing. Layering of Logic seems like a more organized approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rozella
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be A) Linking because tasks are connected in a sequence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
3 months ago
I agree with Jose, because it makes sense to break up tasks into individual layers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) Layering of Logic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
3 months ago
I think the answer is Layering of Logic. That sounds like the most logical way to describe breaking up a process into individual tasks across multiple workspaces.
upvoted 0 times
Stefania
3 months ago
C) Circular Path
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
3 months ago
B) Layering of Logic
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel