Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Blockchain Exam CBSA Topic 8 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBSA exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 8
[All CBSA Questions]

If a hard fork occurs on a public blockchain software and 20 running nodes choose not to update, what can be said about those 20 nodes?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Lang at Dec 08, 2024, 01:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBSA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Justine
1 months ago
I'm going to have to go with A. Those nodes are now operating on a separate network, whether they like it or not. Blockchain doesn't mess around when it comes to hard forks!
upvoted 0 times
Elin
A) I agree, those nodes are definitely on a different network now
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
4 days ago
B) They are considered ''out of compliance''
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
10 days ago
A) They are effectually now operating on a different blockchain network than the nodes that updated
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sina
2 months ago
Yes, that's true. They are unable to achieve consensus and may be flagged for removal from the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
2 months ago
D sounds right to me. If they're not updating, they won't be able to achieve consensus with the rest of the nodes. Might as well be on their own little blockchain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
2 months ago
But aren't they unable to achieve consensus if they don't update?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
2 months ago
Haha, I like C - they get flagged for removal and can't collect fees anymore. That'll teach them to stay up to date!
upvoted 0 times
Ronnie
1 months ago
User 3: Yeah, those 20 nodes are definitely on a different blockchain now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgilio
1 months ago
User 2: I agree with you, A seems to make the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
2 months ago
User 1: I think A is the correct answer. They are now on a different network.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jillian
2 months ago
I agree with Chandra, they are out of compliance with the updated nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
2 months ago
I'd go with B. They're considered out of compliance if they refuse to update with the rest of the network. That's just how it works in the blockchain world.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
2 months ago
Option A seems the most accurate to me. Those nodes are basically on a different blockchain now, so they're not in sync with the rest of the network.
upvoted 0 times
Della
2 months ago
B) They are considered ''out of compliance''
upvoted 0 times
...
Luz
2 months ago
A) They are effectually now operating on a different blockchain network than the nodes that updated
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chandra
3 months ago
I think those 20 nodes are effectually now operating on a different blockchain network than the nodes that updated.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel