New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Blockchain Exam CBDE Topic 4 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBDE exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 4
[All CBDE Questions]

To develop smart contracts:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Rickie at Jul 16, 2024, 09:34 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBDE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Corazon
4 months ago
Haha, can you imagine deploying to the mainnet without Corazonn testing it locally first? That's like trying to fly a plane without, you know, learning how to fly it. Definitely go with B, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
5 months ago
B is the way to do it, no doubt. Don't want to end up like those poor souls who deployed buggy contracts straight to the mainnet. That's a recipe for disaster!
upvoted 0 times
Corinne
4 months ago
Starting with unit tests on a local blockchain and then moving to a test-net is a smart approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
4 months ago
I agree, deploying buggy contracts to the mainnet is a disaster waiting to happen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
4 months ago
I agree, it's better to catch any bugs before deploying to the mainnet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
4 months ago
B is definitely the way to go. Testing on a test-net first is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
4 months ago
B is definitely the way to go. Testing on a test-net first is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merri
5 months ago
I prefer option C because it involves testing with beta customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more thorough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. C seems like a solid approach too. Testnet first, then local simulation could work. Gotta cover all your bases, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Bong
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. C seems like a solid approach too. Testnet first, then local simulation could work. Gotta cover all your bases, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
4 months ago
C) it's good to start with a test-net with beta-customers like on the Rinkeby or Ropsten testnet, before testing it locally on an in-memory blockchain simulation such as Ganache. Then deploy it to the main-net.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
4 months ago
B) it's good to start with a local in-memory blockchain with unit-tests. Then, in the next step, debug and test the smart contract on a test-net like Ropsten or Rinkeby with beta customers to iron out last issues before deploying it to the main-net.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
4 months ago
A) it's good to start with a local in-memory blockchain with unit tests but then deploy to the mainnet as rapidly as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glenna
5 months ago
I agree, B is the correct answer. You don't want to rush to the mainnet without thorough testing on a testnet first. Slow and steady wins the race when it comes to smart contract deployment.
upvoted 0 times
Francine
3 months ago
Slow and steady wins the race when it comes to smart contract deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
4 months ago
I agree, B is the correct answer. You don't want to rush to the mainnet without thorough testing on a testnet first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
4 months ago
B) it's good to start with a local in-memory blockchain with unit-tests. Then, in the next step, debug and test the smart contract on a test-net like Ropsten or Rinkeby with beta customers to iron out last issues before deploying it to the main-net.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
4 months ago
Definitely, rushing to the mainnet without proper testing can lead to costly mistakes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
4 months ago
I agree, testing on a test-net first is crucial before deploying to the mainnet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delfina
5 months ago
I think B is the best option for developing smart contracts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clorinda
5 months ago
B) is the way to go. Testing on a local in-memory blockchain is great for initial development, but you've got to put it through its paces on a testnet before going live on the mainnet.
upvoted 0 times
Tashia
5 months ago
A) it's good to start with a local in-memory blockchain with unit tests but then deploy to the mainnet as rapidly as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
5 months ago
B) is the way to go. Testing on a local in-memory blockchain is great for initial development, but you've got to put it through its paces on a testnet before going live on the mainnet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erin
6 months ago
I think option A is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel