Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Blockchain Exam CBDE Topic 3 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's BTA Certified Blockchain Developer - Ethereum exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 3
[All BTA Certified Blockchain Developer - Ethereum Questions]

If you are starting a new ERC20 token:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lynelle at Jun 02, 2024, 02:16 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBDE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Carrol
2 months ago
Haha, I'd rather not try starting from scratch. That's like building a house without any blueprints.
upvoted 0 times
Romana
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, it's easier to use existing code and modify it to fit your needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, starting from scratch sounds like a lot of work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kattie
2 months ago
B sounds like a recipe for disaster. Modifying existing code can introduce all sorts of vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
Aliza
2 months ago
C is a good idea. Using an audited implementation reduces the risk of introducing vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
2 months ago
A sounds like a safer option. Starting from scratch ensures that the code is clean and secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrine
2 months ago
I agree, starting with an established implementation is the smart choice. Saves a lot of time and effort.
upvoted 0 times
Layla
1 months ago
It saves a lot of time and effort in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
1 months ago
Agreed, it's a smart choice to reuse existing code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
2 months ago
Starting with an audited implementation is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Huey
3 months ago
I agree with Thersa. Starting with audited code reduces the risk of vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
3 months ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. Reusing audited code from OpenZeppelin ensures security and reliability.
upvoted 0 times
Naomi
2 months ago
I agree, starting with an audited implementation like OpenZeppelin's can save a lot of time and effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lino
2 months ago
User 3: It's important to prioritize security when creating a new ERC20 token.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
2 months ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. Reusing audited code from OpenZeppelin ensures security and reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lewis
2 months ago
I agree, starting with an audited implementation is a smart choice for a new ERC20 token.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, starting with an audited implementation is a smart choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
2 months ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. Reusing audited code from OpenZeppelin ensures security and reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
2 months ago
User 1: Option C is definitely the way to go. Reusing audited code from OpenZeppelin ensures security and reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thersa
3 months ago
I think option C is the best choice. It's safer to use audited code.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel