BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Blockchain Exam CBDE Topic 1 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBDE exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 1
[All CBDE Questions]

If you are starting a new ERC20 token:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Joseph at Sep 11, 2024, 04:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBDE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Carmen
1 months ago
Jokes on you, I'm going to use a quantum computer to generate my own unique ERC20 token. No more of this copy-paste business!
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
1 months ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of building vs. borrowing code. I'd say Option C is the most pragmatic choice. Ain't nobody got time for starting from scratch these days.
upvoted 0 times
Lawrence
8 days ago
Copying and pasting code can lead to errors. It's safer to use a trusted source like OpenZeppelin.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
16 days ago
I agree, starting with a solid foundation like OpenZeppelin's implementation is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
19 days ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. Why reinvent the wheel when you can use audited code?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashonda
1 months ago
Haha, Option A? Really? That's like building a house from scratch when you can just use a blueprint. Option C is the way to go, my dude.
upvoted 0 times
Shayne
12 days ago
It's important to prioritize security and efficiency when creating a new ERC20 token.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
15 days ago
I agree, using an audited implementation like OpenZeppelin is definitely the safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monte
17 days ago
Yeah, starting from scratch seems like a lot of unnecessary work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Domitila
2 months ago
I see the benefits of reusing code from OpenZeppelin, it can save time and effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
2 months ago
I prefer starting with an audited implementation to ensure security and reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe copying and modifying existing code is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
2 months ago
I think it's best to start from scratch and design the interface myself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
2 months ago
I'd go with Option B. Modifying existing code is faster and you can customize it to your liking. Who needs all that auditing nonsense?
upvoted 0 times
Meghan
26 days ago
Youlanda: Exactly, no need to reinvent the wheel.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
28 days ago
True, it's better to prioritize security when creating a new token.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
1 months ago
I agree, starting with something already there saves time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
1 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go. It's quicker to modify existing code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
1 months ago
That's a good point. Maybe it's safer to go with Option C and use audited code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
1 months ago
But what if there are security vulnerabilities in the code you copy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
2 months ago
I agree, Option B sounds like the quickest way to get started.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deane
2 months ago
Option C for sure! Why reinvent the wheel when you can use audited code from OpenZeppelin? Saves time and reduces the risk of vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
Valentine
2 months ago
Definitely, it's a smart choice to reduce the risk of vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
2 months ago
I agree, using audited code from OpenZeppelin is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel