Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
Blockchain Discussions
Exam CBDE Topic 1 Question 105 Discussion
Blockchain Exam CBDE Topic 1 Question 105 Discussion
Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBDE exam
Question #: 105
Topic #: 1
[All CBDE Questions]
If you are starting a new ERC20 token:
A
it would be best to start from scratch, just looking at the required interface.
B
it is beneficial to copy and paste the already existing code from the Ethereum wiki and modify this until you like it.
C
best is to start with an audited implementation, for example from OpenZeppelin, in order to reuse already existing code.
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
C
by
Olive
at
Dec 08, 2024, 08:33 AM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium CBDE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Jaclyn
13 days ago
If you're not a blockchain expert, C is the obvious choice. Why risk it when you can build on top of a solid foundation?
upvoted
0
times
...
Martina
16 days ago
Option B sounds like a recipe for a buggy mess. I'll stick with C and let the experts handle the heavy lifting.
upvoted
0
times
...
Darci
20 days ago
Haha, I can just imagine someone trying to write an ERC20 token from scratch. That's a recipe for disaster! C is the clear winner here.
upvoted
0
times
...
Madonna
24 days ago
Definitely C. No need to reinvent the wheel when there are proven solutions out there. Reusing existing code is a smart move.
upvoted
0
times
Georgene
7 days ago
Plus, it gives you a solid foundation to build upon for your new ERC20 token.
upvoted
0
times
...
Xenia
8 days ago
It saves time and reduces the risk of errors by using code that has already been tested.
upvoted
0
times
...
Cassandra
11 days ago
Agreed, starting with an audited implementation like OpenZeppelin is a safe choice.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Irma
1 months ago
I personally think starting with an audited implementation like OpenZeppelin's is the safest option.
upvoted
0
times
...
Evangelina
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's beneficial to copy and paste existing code from Ethereum wiki and modify it.
upvoted
0
times
...
Roxane
2 months ago
I think it's best to start from scratch and look at the required interface.
upvoted
0
times
...
Shaunna
2 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Starting with an audited implementation like OpenZeppelin just makes sense to ensure your token is secure and compliant.
upvoted
0
times
Han
18 days ago
Security and compliance are crucial when creating a new token, so option C seems like the safest bet.
upvoted
0
times
...
Quentin
28 days ago
Using already existing code can save a lot of time and effort in the long run.
upvoted
0
times
...
Ciara
29 days ago
It definitely gives you a solid foundation to build upon for your new ERC20 token.
upvoted
0
times
...
Daryl
1 months ago
I agree, starting with an audited implementation like OpenZeppelin is a smart choice.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Jaclyn
13 days agoMartina
16 days agoDarci
20 days agoMadonna
24 days agoGeorgene
7 days agoXenia
8 days agoCassandra
11 days agoIrma
1 months agoEvangelina
1 months agoRoxane
2 months agoShaunna
2 months agoHan
18 days agoQuentin
28 days agoCiara
29 days agoDaryl
1 months ago