Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Blockchain Exam CBDE Topic 1 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBDE exam
Question #: 105
Topic #: 1
[All CBDE Questions]

If you are starting a new ERC20 token:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Olive at Dec 08, 2024, 08:33 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBDE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Jaclyn
2 months ago
If you're not a blockchain expert, C is the obvious choice. Why risk it when you can build on top of a solid foundation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
2 months ago
Option B sounds like a recipe for a buggy mess. I'll stick with C and let the experts handle the heavy lifting.
upvoted 0 times
Shoshana
16 days ago
Smart choice, let the experts guide the way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
20 days ago
I think it's better to rely on proven code rather than risk introducing bugs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
1 months ago
I agree, starting with an audited implementation is the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darci
2 months ago
Haha, I can just imagine someone trying to write an ERC20 token from scratch. That's a recipe for disaster! C is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
2 months ago
Definitely C. No need to reinvent the wheel when there are proven solutions out there. Reusing existing code is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
Georgene
1 months ago
Plus, it gives you a solid foundation to build upon for your new ERC20 token.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
1 months ago
It saves time and reduces the risk of errors by using code that has already been tested.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassandra
1 months ago
Agreed, starting with an audited implementation like OpenZeppelin is a safe choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Irma
2 months ago
I personally think starting with an audited implementation like OpenZeppelin's is the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's beneficial to copy and paste existing code from Ethereum wiki and modify it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
3 months ago
I think it's best to start from scratch and look at the required interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
3 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Starting with an audited implementation like OpenZeppelin just makes sense to ensure your token is secure and compliant.
upvoted 0 times
Han
2 months ago
Security and compliance are crucial when creating a new token, so option C seems like the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
2 months ago
Using already existing code can save a lot of time and effort in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
2 months ago
It definitely gives you a solid foundation to build upon for your new ERC20 token.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
2 months ago
I agree, starting with an audited implementation like OpenZeppelin is a smart choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel