Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

BCS Exam TM12 Topic 6 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's TM12 exam
Question #: 102
Topic #: 6
[All TM12 Questions]

For which of the following activities would the costs be classified as a cost of detection?

Number of correct responses: 1

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Sommer at Oct 24, 2024, 11:10 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TM12 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Samira
3 months ago
Fixing field failures? No way, that's gotta be a cost of failure, not detection. I'm going with C, easy choice.
upvoted 0 times
Arleen
2 months ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
2 months ago
I see your point, but I think C is more directly related to detecting defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
2 months ago
A) Writing test specifications according to the test design
upvoted 0 times
...
Johana
2 months ago
That makes sense, it's definitely a cost of detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrie
3 months ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justine
4 months ago
Haha, I bet the developers would love some extra training on the new coding language. But yeah, option C is the way to go for this one.
upvoted 0 times
Santos
2 months ago
Fixing field failures would fall under cost of prevention, not detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
2 months ago
Developers might benefit from training, but that's not a cost of detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
2 months ago
Yeah, re-running a test case to verify a fix sounds like a detection cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
3 months ago
I agree, option C is definitely a cost of detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stevie
4 months ago
I agree with Terry, re-running a test case to verify a fix sounds like a cost of detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
4 months ago
I'm not too sure about this one. I was thinking maybe option B, but I guess C could work too. Hmm, tough call.
upvoted 0 times
Kanisha
3 months ago
D) Fixing field failures
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
4 months ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
4 months ago
B) Training developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
4 months ago
A) Writing test specifications according to the test design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Terry
4 months ago
I think the cost of detection would be for option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
4 months ago
Option C seems like the right answer here. Re-running a test case to verify a fix definitely sounds like a cost of detection to me.
upvoted 0 times
Sophia
4 months ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
Luz
4 months ago
B) Training developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project
upvoted 0 times
...
Evan
4 months ago
A) Writing test specifications according to the test design
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel