BCS Exam TAE Topic 2 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's TAE exam

Question #: 50
Topic #: 2

Consider A TAS for testing a desktop application via its GUI. All the test cases of the automated test suite contain the same identical sequences of steps at the beginning (to create the necessary objects when doing a preliminary configuration of the test environment and at the end (to remove everything created --specifically for the test itself during the preliminary configuration of the test environment). All automated test cases use the same set of assertion functions from a shared library, for verifying the values in the GUI fields ( e.g text boxes).

What is the BEST recommendation for improving the TAS?

AImplementing keywords with higher level of granularity

BImproving the architecture of the application in order to improve its testability

CAdopting a set of standard verification methods for use by all automated tests

DImplementing standard setup and teardown functions at test case level

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Tamera at Sep 10, 2024, 12:02 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Alverta

2 months ago

I personally think implementing standard setup and teardown functions at test case level would be the most efficient way to improve the TAS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

2 months ago

I believe adopting a set of standard verification methods for use by all automated tests could also be a good option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Myra

2 months ago

Option B? Really? Improving the app's architecture? That's like putting lipstick on a pig. Just use Option D and move on with your life.

upvoted 0 times

Cornell

30 days ago

D) Implementing standard setup and teardown functions at test case level

upvoted 0 times

...

Billye

1 months ago

C) Adopting a set of standard verification methods for use by all automated tests

upvoted 0 times

...

Rory

1 months ago

A) Implementing keywords with higher level of granularity

upvoted 0 times

...

Patrick

2 months ago

I'm going with Option C. Adopting a set of standard verification methods for all tests will ensure consistency and reduce errors. It's the most comprehensive solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Apolonia

2 months ago

I agree with Eloisa, having more granularity in keywords can make the test suite more flexible and easier to maintain.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alline

2 months ago

I agree with Chery. Option D is the clear winner here. Who wants to write the same code over and over again in each test case?

upvoted 0 times

Yolande

2 months ago

True, having a set of standard verification methods could also streamline the testing process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ming

2 months ago

Implementing keywords with higher level of granularity could also be helpful in improving the TAS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentin

2 months ago

I agree, having standard setup and teardown functions will make the test cases more consistent and easier to maintain.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittni

2 months ago

I think option D is the way to go. It will definitely save time and make the test suite more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eloisa

2 months ago

I think implementing keywords with higher level of granularity would be the best recommendation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chery

2 months ago

Option D is the way to go. Implementing standard setup and teardown functions at the test case level will make the test suite much more maintainable and less redundant.

upvoted 0 times

Floyd

2 months ago

I agree, having standard setup and teardown functions will save a lot of time and effort in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Major

2 months ago

Option D is definitely the best choice. It will make managing the test suite a lot easier.

upvoted 0 times

...