Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

BCS Exam TAE Topic 1 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's TAE exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 1
[All TAE Questions]

A regression test suite consist of 500 test cases which are all executed manually. The business case for a pilot project is based on the adoption of test automation using a commercial tool that will reduce the execution time by a factor of 90% for 100% of the tests in the regression test suite. The pilot project lasted one month ( as planned) and you are currently its results. At the end of the pilot project, 40% of the regression tests have been automated and their execution time has been reduce by 60%.

Which of the following statements is TRUE in this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Leonardo at Sep 12, 2024, 11:02 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Precious
5 months ago
I don't know, the pilot project seems to be on the right track. 40% automation is a solid start, and they can always adjust the targets for the full project. Option A might be a bit too harsh.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
5 months ago
Haha, the business case sounds like something straight out of a management consultant's playbook. 'Reduce by 90% for 100% of the tests' - that's some serious marketing jargon right there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
5 months ago
Agreed. The business case appears to be overly optimistic. A 60% reduction in execution time for the automated tests is still a good start, but the overall target is too aggressive.
upvoted 0 times
Garry
4 months ago
D: True, it takes time to fully automate such a large test suite. The pilot project should have been longer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
4 months ago
C: The duration of the pilot project was too short -- it should last until the success factors are achieved
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
5 months ago
C: The duration of the pilot project was too short -- it should last until the success factors are achieved
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
5 months ago
B: Yeah, I agree. A 60% reduction is good, but aiming for 90% reduction for all tests is too ambitious.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
5 months ago
B: Agreed, a 60% reduction is still a good start but the overall target is too aggressive
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
5 months ago
A: The target defined for the business case seems difficult to hit -- it should be realistic
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
5 months ago
A: The target defined for the business case seems difficult to hit -- it should be realistic
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pamella
5 months ago
But the target defined for the business case seems difficult to hit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
5 months ago
I agree, it should last until the success factors are achieved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
5 months ago
The target of 90% reduction in execution time seems quite ambitious. I'd go with option D - it should be more realistic.
upvoted 0 times
Kent
5 months ago
It's important to set realistic targets in order to achieve success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
5 months ago
Maybe the duration of the pilot project was too short, that's why only 40% of tests were automated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
5 months ago
I think option D makes sense, the target should be more realistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
5 months ago
I agree, the target of 90% reduction does seem ambitious.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barrett
6 months ago
I think the duration of the pilot project was too short.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel