New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BCS Exam CTFL4 Topic 1 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's CTFL4 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 1
[All CTFL4 Questions]

Consider an estimation session in which a six-member Agile team (Memb1..... Memb6) uses the planning poker technique to estimate a user story (in story points). The team members will use a set of cards with the following values: 1,2, 3,5, 8,13,21. Below is the outcome of the first round of estimation for this session:

Which of the following answers BEST describes how the estimation session should proceed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

In Agile teams using the planning poker technique for estimating user stories, it is common practice to have further discussions and rounds of estimation if there is a significant discrepancy in the initial estimates. This helps in reaching a consensus and ensures that all team members understand the complexity and requirements of the user story. According to the ISTQB CTFL syllabus, planning poker involves discussions to clarify differences in estimates, especially when there is a wide range of values selected. By having Memb6 and Memb4, who provided the most pessimistic and optimistic estimates, explain their reasoning, it fosters a deeper understanding and encourages the team to converge towards a more accurate and agreed-upon estimate.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Hollis
18 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A could also be a valid approach. Using the three-point estimation technique might provide a more balanced estimate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
21 days ago
This is why we use planning poker - to avoid one person skewing the entire estimate. Let's keep talking it through until we reach a consensus.
upvoted 0 times
Kindra
4 days ago
Let's discuss why Memb6 and Memb4 chose such extreme estimates.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Trina
1 months ago
Memb6 must have been daydreaming when they chose 1 story point. I bet they were thinking about their weekend plans instead of the task at hand!
upvoted 0 times
Benton
10 days ago
Memb2: Maybe we should consider the average of our estimates for a more balanced approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
13 days ago
Memb4: I was optimistic with my estimate, but let's discuss before the next round.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
17 days ago
Memb6: Oops, I might have underestimated the story points.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashonda
1 months ago
I agree with Pamela. It's crucial to have a discussion and gain insights from Memb6 and Memb4 before moving forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
1 months ago
Totally agree. We need to understand each other's perspectives before settling on a final estimate. Discussing the reasoning behind the outliers is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
1 months ago
I think the team should keep going with the planning poker until we all agree on a number. Averaging the extremes doesn't seem right to me.
upvoted 0 times
Justine
3 days ago
I agree, we should continue with more rounds of estimation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pamela
1 months ago
I think we should go with option D. It's important to understand the reasoning behind the extreme estimates.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel