BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BCS Exam AIF Topic 8 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's AIF exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 8
[All AIF Questions]

What technique can be adopted when a weak learners hypothesis accuracy is only slightly better than 50%?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Weak Learner: Colloquially, a model that performs slightly better than a naive model.

More formally, the notion has been generalized to multi-class classification and has a different meaning beyond better than 50 percent accuracy.

For binary classification, it is well known that the exact requirement for weak learners is to be better than random guess. [...] Notice that requiring base learners to be better than random guess is too weak for multi-class problems, yet requiring better than 50% accuracy is too stringent.

--- Page 46,Ensemble Methods, 2012.

It is based on formal computational learning theory that proposes a class of learning methods that possess weakly learnability, meaning that they perform better than random guessing. Weak learnability is proposed as a simplification of the more desirable strong learnability, where a learnable achieved arbitrary good classification accuracy.

A weaker model of learnability, called weak learnability, drops the requirement that the learner be able to achieve arbitrarily high accuracy; a weak learning algorithm needs only output an hypothesis that performs slightly better (by an inverse polynomial) than random guessing.

---The Strength of Weak Learnability, 1990.

It is a useful concept as it is often used to describe the capabilities of contributing members of ensemble learning algorithms. For example, sometimes members of a bootstrap aggregation are referred to as weak learners as opposed to strong, at least in the colloquial meaning of the term.

More specifically, weak learners are the basis for the boosting class of ensemble learning algorithms.

The term boosting refers to a family of algorithms that are able to convert weak learners to strong learners.

https://machinelearningmastery.com/strong-learners-vs-weak-learners-for-ensemble-learning/

The best technique to adopt when a weak learner's hypothesis accuracy is only slightly better than 50% is boosting. Boosting is an ensemble learning technique that combines multiple weak learners (i.e., models with a low accuracy) to create a more powerful model. Boosting works by iteratively learning a series of weak learners, each of which is slightly better than random guessing. The output of each weak learner is then combined to form a more accurate model. Boosting is a powerful technique that has been proven to improve the accuracy of a wide range of machine learning tasks. For more information, please see the BCS Foundation Certificate In Artificial Intelligence Study Guide or the resources listed above.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Janessa
6 months ago
I think over-fitting should be avoided in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
6 months ago
I'm not sure about boosting, maybe iteration could also be considered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggy
6 months ago
I agree with boosting helps improve the accuracy of weak learners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
7 months ago
I think boosting can be adopted in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
7 months ago
Lashawnda: That makes sense. Thanks for the clarification.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
7 months ago
Lynda: Boosting involves combining weak learners to create a strong learner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
7 months ago
Jeanice: No, over-fitting is not the best option in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynda
7 months ago
Over-fitting is not the right choice then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
7 months ago
Boosting could help in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
7 months ago
What technique can we use when a weak learners hypothesis accuracy is slightly better than 50%?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel