BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
BACB Discussions
Exam BCBA Topic 4 Question 91 Discussion
BACB Exam BCBA Topic 4 Question 91 Discussion
Actual exam question for BACB's BCBA exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 4
[All BCBA Questions]
The use of an alternating treatments design should be considered iF:
A
it is important that multiple interventions be evaluated quickly.
B
one needs to evaluate the effects of a single intervention across multiple settings.
C
the results of multiple reversal designs are ambiguous.
D
there is the possibility that the effect of one intervention will influence the effect of another.
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
A
by
Niesha
at
Jul 05, 2024, 07:11 AM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium BCBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Olen
4 months ago
I'm just gonna go with C. Reversal designs? More like reversal nightmares, am I right?
upvoted
0
times
Johnna
2 months ago
I prefer using alternating treatments design for quick evaluation of interventions.
upvoted
0
times
...
Keshia
2 months ago
Yeah, it's important to consider different research designs for accurate evaluations.
upvoted
0
times
...
Carolann
3 months ago
I think alternating treatments design can help clarify ambiguous results.
upvoted
0
times
...
Josphine
3 months ago
I agree, reversal designs can be tricky to interpret.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Thomasena
4 months ago
I think it's crucial to consider alternating treatments design when multiple interventions need to be evaluated quickly.
upvoted
0
times
...
Bulah
4 months ago
I believe alternating treatments design is also useful when there is a possibility that the effect of one intervention will influence the effect of another.
upvoted
0
times
...
Leana
4 months ago
I agree with Aileen. It's important to have a clear method to evaluate interventions when the results are unclear.
upvoted
0
times
...
Oretha
4 months ago
Haha, option C? Reversal designs? What is this, the 80s? Go with the alternating treatments, my friend.
upvoted
0
times
Danilo
3 months ago
Definitely, no need to stick with old methods when there are more efficient options available.
upvoted
0
times
...
Rhea
3 months ago
I agree, alternating treatments design allows for quick evaluation of multiple interventions.
upvoted
0
times
...
Aleshia
3 months ago
Yeah, option C seems outdated. Alternating treatments design is the way to go.
upvoted
0
times
...
Lavonne
3 months ago
Definitely, alternating treatments design is more efficient than relying on reversal designs.
upvoted
0
times
...
Cheryl
3 months ago
I agree, we need to consider using alternating treatments for quick evaluation of multiple interventions.
upvoted
0
times
...
Cherry
4 months ago
Yeah, option C seems outdated. Alternating treatments design is the way to go.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Teddy
4 months ago
Ooh, option B sounds like a good way to get a well-rounded evaluation. Gotta try it in all the settings!
upvoted
0
times
Charolette
3 months ago
Yeah, it can give a more comprehensive understanding of its effectiveness.
upvoted
0
times
...
Gabriele
3 months ago
I agree, it's important to see how the intervention works in different settings.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Aileen
4 months ago
I think the use of an alternating treatments design should be considered if the results of multiple reversal designs are ambiguous.
upvoted
0
times
...
Weldon
4 months ago
Hold on, isn't option D the correct one? Can't have those pesky intervention effects influencing each other.
upvoted
0
times
Dalene
4 months ago
I see, so option D is the best choice to consider when using an alternating treatments design.
upvoted
0
times
...
Bettye
4 months ago
That's true, but in this case, option D is more relevant to avoid any potential confounding effects.
upvoted
0
times
...
Ammie
4 months ago
But what about option A? It's also important to evaluate multiple interventions quickly.
upvoted
0
times
...
Delisa
4 months ago
Yes, option D is correct. We want to avoid any interference between interventions.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Alecia
5 months ago
Definitely option A. I need to evaluate those interventions pronto!
upvoted
0
times
Timothy
4 months ago
I agree, we don't have time to waste. Let's get started with the alternating treatments design.
upvoted
0
times
...
Herman
4 months ago
Option A is definitely the way to go. We need to evaluate those interventions quickly.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Olen
4 months agoJohnna
2 months agoKeshia
2 months agoCarolann
3 months agoJosphine
3 months agoThomasena
4 months agoBulah
4 months agoLeana
4 months agoOretha
4 months agoDanilo
3 months agoRhea
3 months agoAleshia
3 months agoLavonne
3 months agoCheryl
3 months agoCherry
4 months agoTeddy
4 months agoCharolette
3 months agoGabriele
3 months agoAileen
4 months agoWeldon
4 months agoDalene
4 months agoBettye
4 months agoAmmie
4 months agoDelisa
4 months agoAlecia
5 months agoTimothy
4 months agoHerman
4 months ago