New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Atlassian Exam ACP-610 Topic 3 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Atlassian's ACP-610 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 3
[All ACP-610 Questions]

You need to assign team members to view code commits in the DEV project. An excerpt of the DEV permission scheme is shown.

Which two project roles must they be granted? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Two project roles that must be granted to view code commits in the DEV project are:

Developers

Administrators

According to the image you sent, the View Development Tools permission determines which users can see development information from tools such as Bitbucket, GitHub, FishEye, and Crucible. This permission is granted to the Project role (Developers) and the Project role (Administrators) in the DEV permission scheme. Therefore, users who are assigned to these roles will be able to view code commits in the DEV project.

The other options are not correct because:

Users do not have the View Development Tools permission in the DEV permission scheme, so they cannot see code commits in the DEV project.

Sprinters do not have the View Development Tools permission in the DEV permission scheme, so they cannot see code commits in the DEV project.

Managers do not have the View Development Tools permission in the DEV permission scheme, so they cannot see code commits in the DEV project.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Colene
2 months ago
Haha, B) Administrators? That's like giving the janitor the keys to the CEO's office. C) Developers and D) Sprinters are the way to go, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
Roslyn
23 days ago
Exactly, it's important to assign the right roles for the right tasks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
24 days ago
C) Developers and D) Sprinters have the necessary access without giving too much control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
1 months ago
Definitely, C) Developers and D) Sprinters are more appropriate for that task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
1 months ago
I agree, B) Administrators seems excessive for just viewing code commits.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Oneida
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about D) Sprinters. Aren't they more focused on managing the sprint process? C) Developers and E) Managers seem more logical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
2 months ago
B) Administrators? Really? That's overkill for just reviewing code commits. C) Developers and D) Sprinters are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
2 months ago
I agree with C) Developers, but I think E) Managers should also be included. They need to stay on top of project progress.
upvoted 0 times
Luis
1 months ago
Yes, managers should have visibility into the project as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
1 months ago
I also think E) Managers should be included to monitor progress.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
2 months ago
I agree, developers need to review the code commits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
2 months ago
I think C) Developers should definitely be granted access.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audry
2 months ago
Definitely C) Developers and D) Sprinters. They need access to code commits to do their job effectively.
upvoted 0 times
Fausto
1 months ago
It's important to assign the right team members to ensure smooth workflow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
2 months ago
Yes, those roles are essential for viewing code commits in the DEV project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
2 months ago
I agree, C) Developers and D) Sprinters should be granted access.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
3 months ago
I'm not sure about Administrators role. Maybe Users and Developers would be enough for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
3 months ago
I agree with Brandee. Developers and Administrators roles make sense for viewing code commits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
3 months ago
I think the team members should be granted Developers and Administrators roles.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel