New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Atlassian Exam ACP-100 Topic 5 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Atlassian's ACP-100 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 5
[All ACP-100 Questions]

One of your project owners is struggling with reporting and sorting issues in her project. Currently, the classification of the issues is no more useful than a list of things that need to be done.

The project owners would like to establish the following:

* more classification of issues, so issues can belong to several classes

* the ability to edit classes

* a way to link a class to an owner

How would you help this project owner improve issue reporting and sorting?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: E

by Audra at Jul 18, 2024, 06:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ACP-100 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Man
4 months ago
Hmm, B and C don't really address the core issues here. A seems like the most comprehensive solution. Now, if only the project owner could sort their issues as easily as sorting their sock drawer...
upvoted 0 times
Annamae
4 months ago
If only sorting socks was as easy as sorting project issues!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
4 months ago
E) Add a custom field of type Select List (multiple choices) for class, naming an owner in the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
4 months ago
A seems like the most comprehensive solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
4 months ago
E) Add a custom field of type Select List (multiple choices) for class, naming an owner in the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
4 months ago
A) Add a custom field of type Select List (multiple choices) for class, linked to a class-owner field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
4 months ago
A) Add a custom field of type Select List (multiple choices) for class, linked to a class-owner field.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merissa
5 months ago
E is a bit too simplistic. I think having a separate class-owner field is a better approach. A is the winner!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
5 months ago
D sounds interesting, but I'm not sure if the cascading option is necessary. A seems like the simplest and most effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
Carolynn
4 months ago
A sounds like the best option for improving issue reporting and sorting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
4 months ago
Yeah, I agree. D might be a bit too complicated for what they need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
4 months ago
I think A is the way to go, it's simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elvera
5 months ago
I guess it depends on the specific needs of the project owner. Different options could work in different scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
5 months ago
A is definitely the way to go! Linking classes to owners is crucial for better issue management.
upvoted 0 times
Jerry
4 months ago
A is definitely the way to go! Linking classes to owners is crucial for better issue management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
5 months ago
B) Ensure the component field is available in the project and demonstrate how to use it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
5 months ago
A) Add a custom field of type Select List (multiple choices) for class, linked to a class-owner field.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alisha
5 months ago
That's a good point, Mose. Option B) could be a straightforward solution for the project owner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
5 months ago
I see your points, but I think option B) is the most practical. It's simple and easy to use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D) would work better. It provides a cascading list for classes and owners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
6 months ago
I think option A) would be the best solution. It allows for multiple classifications and linking to owners.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel