ASQ Exam CQE Topic 9 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CQE exam

Question #: 89
Topic #: 9

[All CQE Questions]

The primary advantage of the Latin square design, compared to the factorial design, is that

AIn most circumstances, it requires less data.

BIt eliminates the need for interaction analysis.

CIt allows higher significance levels.

DIt does not require homogeneity of variance.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Aretha at Jun 03, 2024, 09:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CQE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Erinn

5 months ago

This exam is making my head spin like a Latin square. I might as well just throw a dice to pick the answer.

upvoted 0 times

Glory

4 months ago

I wish we could just throw a dice to pick the answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laquanda

5 months ago

I know, this Latin square design is really confusing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Franklyn

5 months ago

Homogeneity of variance? Who cares about that anyway? I'm going with option D, just because it's the most random-sounding choice.

upvoted 0 times

Bulah

4 months ago

I'm going with option A, it requires less data in most circumstances.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adrianna

4 months ago

I think option B is the best choice, it eliminates the need for interaction analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herminia

4 months ago

I agree, option D does sound pretty random.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karina

5 months ago

Higher significance levels? Sounds like a win to me! Option C gets my vote.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alishia

5 months ago

I agree with Princess, that can save a lot of time and effort in the analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Princess

5 months ago

I believe it's because it eliminates the need for interaction analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bong

6 months ago

What do you think is the primary advantage of the Latin square design?

upvoted 0 times

...

Alberto

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about the interaction analysis bit. Wouldn't the factorial design be better for that? I'm leaning towards option B.

upvoted 0 times

Rikki

5 months ago

Yes, Latin square design simplifies the analysis by removing the need for interaction analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandon

5 months ago

I agree, Latin square design is more efficient in that aspect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Doyle

5 months ago

I think option B is correct. Latin square design eliminates the need for interaction analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

6 months ago

The Latin square design is more efficient in terms of data requirements. That's why I think option A is the correct answer here.

upvoted 0 times

Darnell

5 months ago

I think option C is also a good choice, it allows for higher significance levels which can be beneficial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lizbeth

5 months ago

I agree, option A makes sense. Latin square design is definitely more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alana

5 months ago

But I think option B is also a good choice because it eliminates the need for interaction analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vashti

5 months ago

But don't you think option B is also a valid advantage? It eliminates the need for interaction analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gregg

5 months ago

I agree, option A makes sense because Latin square design does require less data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audria

5 months ago

I agree, option A makes sense because Latin square design does require less data.

upvoted 0 times

...