You know, I'm just happy we're not talking about nested designs. Those things make my head spin like a top. At least with a Latin square, I can visualize the whole thing and feel like I have a handle on it.
Hold up, did someone say 'homogeneity of variance'? That's my middle name! Okay, not really, but I do love a good assumption-free design. Latin squares are like the Swiss Army knife of experimental designs.
Hmm, I'm not convinced. Eliminating interaction analysis seems like a pretty big deal to me. I'm not trying to do extra work, but I also don't want to miss out on any juicy interactions, you know?
I don't know, I'm leaning more towards C. Higher significance levels? Sign me up! I want my results to be so statistically significant that they practically jump off the page and do a little dance.
I'm pretty sure the answer is A - it requires less data. I mean, who wants to fill out a million factorial design forms? Latin squares are like the lazy person's dream come true.
Ooh, a Latin square design question! These can be tricky, but I think the key advantage is that it allows us to control for more sources of variability compared to a factorial design. It's like having a magic square that cancels out those pesky nuisance factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Sherill
5 months agoLatosha
5 months agoRosamond
5 months agoDick
5 months agoIlda
6 months agoRachael
6 months agoHannah
6 months agoEdna
7 months agoDalene
7 months agoCarolann
7 months agoLajuana
6 months agoDonette
6 months agoTenesha
6 months agoMarcos
7 months agoBrynn
7 months agoDiane
7 months agoGearldine
8 months ago