Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASIS Exam ASIS-PCI Topic 3 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASIS's ASIS-PCI exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 3
[All ASIS-PCI Questions]

An undercover investigation has yielded enough information to allow the operative to be removed. What is the correct procedure m removing the operative?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Clemencia
3 months ago
I think A is the way to go. The operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, so as not to raise any suspicions.
upvoted 0 times
Hector
2 months ago
B) The operative should be removed prior to any Interviews taking place with suspected offenders
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
2 months ago
A) The operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, preferably when named as an offender
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devora
3 months ago
Haha, this question is a real head-scratcher. I'll just go with the most dramatic option, C. The operative should never remain in place, no matter what!
upvoted 0 times
Marg
2 months ago
User 4: Yeah, better safe than sorry when it comes to undercover work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
2 months ago
User 3: Definitely, we can't risk the operative's cover being compromised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, it's important to act quickly in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
2 months ago
User 1: I think the operative should be removed as soon as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jimmie
3 months ago
I think the operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, preferably when named as an offender. This way, it can help maintain the cover story for future operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
3 months ago
I agree with Ressie. It's important to remove the operative quickly to prevent any potential harm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
3 months ago
I think the operative should be removed as soon as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards B. The operative should be removed before any interviews take place, right?
upvoted 0 times
Wade
2 months ago
C) The operative should never remain in place even If their cover story has not been compromised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
3 months ago
B) The operative should be removed prior to any Interviews taking place with suspected offenders
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
3 months ago
A) The operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, preferably when named as an offender
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rhea
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C might be the best option. The operative shouldn't remain in place even if their cover story hasn't been compromised.
upvoted 0 times
Maryanne
2 months ago
C) The operative should never remain in place even If their cover story has not been compromised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
3 months ago
D) The operative should be removed as soon as possible
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
3 months ago
A) The operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, preferably when named as an offender
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beckie
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is D. The operative should be removed as soon as possible to minimize the risk of exposure.
upvoted 0 times
Dottie
3 months ago
D) The operative should be removed as soon as possible
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
3 months ago
C) The operative should never remain in place even If their cover story has not been compromised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
3 months ago
B) The operative should be removed prior to any Interviews taking place with suspected offenders
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
3 months ago
A) The operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, preferably when named as an offender
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel