Arcitura Education Exam S90.18 Topic 1 Question 101 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.18 exam

Question #: 101
Topic #: 1

You are responsible for designing Service A, which must compose Services B and C. You are able to apply the necessary security mechanisms to ensure that messages exchanged by Service A comply with your security requirements. However, you are not given access to the design specifications for Services B and C. Based on the information that is published about Services B and C, you cannot guarantee that these services will provide the same level of security as Service A . This limitation was placed upon you as a result of the application of which service-orientation principle?

AService Loose Coupling

BService Autonomy

CService Statelessness

DService Abstraction

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Tiara at Sep 12, 2024, 08:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.18 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Rozella

26 days ago

Can we just glue Service A, B, and C together and call it a day? No security issues if there's no separation, right? Just kidding, I'm going with D. Service Abstraction, the only way to keep our sanity.

upvoted 0 times

Bronwyn

9 days ago

But what about Service Loose Coupling? Wouldn't that also help with security?

upvoted 0 times

...

Scot

10 days ago

Yeah, I agree. Service Abstraction is the way to go to maintain security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

1 months ago

Wow, talk about a headache. Sounds like a trust fall exercise gone wrong. I'll go with D. Service Abstraction, but I might need a nap after this one.

upvoted 0 times

Dawne

6 days ago

B) Service Autonomy

upvoted 0 times

...

Dana

18 days ago

A) Service Loose Coupling

upvoted 0 times

...

Francoise

1 months ago

Hold up, did they say we can't access the design specs? That's like telling a mechanic to fix a car without letting them see the engine. Gotta be D. Service Abstraction, right?

upvoted 0 times

Ozell

15 days ago

I think Service Abstraction makes more sense in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

19 days ago

But what about Service Loose Coupling? Could that also be a factor?

upvoted 0 times

...

Shayne

21 days ago

Yeah, I agree. It's definitely Service Abstraction.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aja

1 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) Service Abstraction, as it hides the complexity of the underlying services.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrett

2 months ago

I agree with Bernardine, because Service Autonomy allows each service to control its own security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardine

2 months ago

I think the answer is B) Service Autonomy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gracia

2 months ago

Hah, talk about a trust issue! If I can't see under the hood, how can I be sure those other services are secure? I'm going with B. Service Autonomy on this one.

upvoted 0 times

Natalie

26 days ago

Definitely, Service Autonomy ensures that each service can control its own security measures independently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ollie

1 months ago

Yeah, that's why I think Service Autonomy is the right choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loreen

1 months ago

I agree, it's hard to trust the security of Services B and C without access to their design specifications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daniela

2 months ago

I think the answer is D. Service Abstraction. We're not given access to the design specs for Services B and C, so we can't guarantee their security level. Abstraction is the way to go here.

upvoted 0 times