Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Arcitura Education Exam S90.05 Topic 4 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.05 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 4
[All S90.05 Questions]

The technical architecture department contacts you to tell you that all existing WSDL definitions need to be modified to add an additional concrete description in order to bind the service to a new version of SOAP. You begin with the WSDL definition for the Notification service, as shown here:

Given the fact that this WSDL definition has only one "operation" element, which new elements will need to be added in order to add the concrete description described above?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Cyril at Dec 06, 2024, 11:11 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.05 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Catherin
3 months ago
I think adding just the 'portType' element should be enough, we don't need the 'service' element for this modification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
3 months ago
I'm not sure, maybe we also need a 'service' element along with the 'portType' and 'binding' elements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
3 months ago
I agree with Hassie, adding those elements makes sense for binding the service to a new version of SOAP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
3 months ago
I wonder if the exam writers are trying to trick us with this question. Option B seems too obvious, but maybe that's the point?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
3 months ago
This is a classic case of 'keep it simple, stupid'. Option A is the way to go, no need for extra elements we don't need.
upvoted 0 times
Elbert
3 months ago
Yes, option A seems like the most efficient choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Destiny
3 months ago
I agree, keeping it simple is always the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hassie
3 months ago
I think we need to add a 'portType' element and a 'binding' element.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
3 months ago
I'm gonna have to go with option A. It seems like the most direct way to add the concrete description without overcomplexifying things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
3 months ago
Hmm, this is tricky. I'm leaning towards option B, but I wonder if the 'service' element is really necessary in this case.
upvoted 0 times
Marylou
3 months ago
Great, I'll make the necessary modifications to the WSDL definition accordingly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
3 months ago
Let's go with option B then. It seems like the most comprehensive choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
3 months ago
I agree, adding the 'service' element might be overkill for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
3 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. It covers all the bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reyes
4 months ago
Option A looks like the right answer here. We just need to add a 'portType' and 'binding' element to the existing WSDL definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
4 months ago
The question seems straightforward, but I'm not sure if I should go with option B since it mentions adding a 'service' element.
upvoted 0 times
Isaiah
3 months ago
Great choice! Option B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
3 months ago
That makes sense. Option B it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
3 months ago
I see, thanks for clarifying. I'll go with option B then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
3 months ago
Option B is correct. You need to add a 'service' element along with 'portType' and 'binding'.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel