Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Arcitura Education Exam S90.05 Topic 4 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.05 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 4
[All S90.05 Questions]

Your company has developed a PO service that allows customers to submit purchase order documents. The message sent by a customer must be based on a predefined "purchaseOrder" element and the message received by the customer is based on a "messageAcknowledgement" element. These two elements are defined in the following two separate XML Schema definitions:

The "purchaseOrder.xsd" schema:

Note that these two schemas have different namespaces. That is because the "purchaseOrder.xsd" schema is specific to purchase order-related functions, while the "ack.xsd" schema is more generic and used for a variety of different purposes.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Clorinda
1 months ago
I'm sorry, but Option A is the only one that doesn't make me giggle like a schoolgirl. Separate namespaces for separate purposes? Seems like common sense to me. Time to put on my serious face and select the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
Lavonna
3 days ago
Katie: Let's go with Option A then, it's the most professional choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
24 days ago
User 2: Yeah, having separate namespaces for different purposes makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
29 days ago
User 1: I agree, Option A does seem like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malcom
1 months ago
Option D? Really? I mean, I get that the namespaces are separate, but come on, that's just a silly answer. I'm going with Option A, it's the only one that makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
1 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm leaning towards Option C. The question is really testing our understanding of XML schema design principles, and I think that's the best answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Cornell
12 days ago
I see your point, but I still believe Option C is the correct answer based on the information provided in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
16 days ago
I think Option A could also be a valid choice, as it may depend on the specific requirements of the purchase order service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
26 days ago
I agree, Option C seems to be the most appropriate choice considering the different namespaces for the schemas.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bernardine
2 months ago
Hmm, the different namespaces are a bit confusing, but I think Option B is the way to go. The schemas seem to be well-defined, so I'll trust my gut on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Maynard
27 days ago
User 3: Option B it is then, let's go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
28 days ago
User 2: Yeah, the schemas are well-defined, so I think Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
29 days ago
User 1: I agree, Option B seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cruz
2 months ago
The namespaces being different makes sense, as the schemas are for different purposes. I'd go with Option A, as it seems the most logical choice given the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
Eveline
19 days ago
Option A makes sense considering the different purposes of the schemas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
20 days ago
I think Option A is the best fit for the predefined 'purchaseOrder' element.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
30 days ago
Yes, Option A aligns with the specific purpose of the 'purchaseOrder.xsd' schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
1 months ago
I agree, Option A does seem like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nicholle
3 months ago
I believe the correct answer might be Option A, as it seems to be related to the 'purchaseOrder' element.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
3 months ago
I agree, we need to understand how the 'purchaseOrder' and 'messageAcknowledgement' elements are defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicholle
3 months ago
I think the question is asking about XML Schema definitions.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel