Arcitura Education Exam S90.03 Topic 3 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.03 exam

Question #: 111
Topic #: 3

Which service-orientation principle would be used to justify a corporate policy that limits or restricts access to technical specifications that show design and technology details about the underlying implementation of a published service? Select the correct answer.

AService Discoverability

BService Statelessness

CService Autonomy

DService Abstraction

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Samira at May 02, 2025, 09:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.03 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Blondell

3 months ago

I'm gonna have to go with service abstraction on this one. Gotta keep those implementation secrets under lock and key!

upvoted 0 times

Goldie

1 months ago

Agreed, it's all about protecting the underlying implementation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellen

2 months ago

Definitely, it helps maintain the independence of the service.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucina

2 months ago

Yeah, it's important to keep those details hidden from users.

upvoted 0 times

...

Velda

2 months ago

I think service abstraction makes sense in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janae

3 months ago

Haha, good luck trying to get any IT guy to give up their precious technical details! Service autonomy all the way.

upvoted 0 times

Timothy

2 months ago

True, but service autonomy ensures that the service has control over its own functionality and data, which is crucial in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonny

2 months ago

But wouldn't service abstraction also be important in this case to hide the complexity of the underlying implementation?

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

3 months ago

I agree, service autonomy is key when it comes to protecting those technical details.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tess

3 months ago

Definitely, we need to limit access to certain details for security reasons.

upvoted 0 times

...

Peggie

3 months ago

I agree, service autonomy is key in protecting sensitive information.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thaddeus

3 months ago

I see where you're coming from, Tashia, but I still think D) Service Abstraction is the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tashia

3 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think C) Service Autonomy could also be a valid option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nichelle

4 months ago

Service discoverability is important, but in this case, restricting access to the technical specs is more about service abstraction, isn't it?

upvoted 0 times

Isadora

3 months ago

Service discoverability is important, but in this case, service abstraction seems to be the main principle at play.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vincenza

3 months ago

That's a good point, service autonomy does play a role in controlling access to certain information.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonette

3 months ago

I think service autonomy could also be a factor in limiting access to technical specifications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Freeman

3 months ago

Yes, you're right. It's all about service abstraction.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sylvia

4 months ago

I think service abstraction makes the most sense here. Hiding the implementation details helps protect the service's autonomy.

upvoted 0 times

Micaela

3 months ago

Service abstraction definitely makes sense in this scenario to hide the implementation details.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karan

3 months ago

I think service autonomy is the best choice to limit access to technical specifications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katie

3 months ago

I agree, service abstraction would help protect the service's autonomy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Von

4 months ago

I agree with Cyril. Service Abstraction makes sense in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyril

4 months ago

I think the answer is D) Service Abstraction.

upvoted 0 times

...