BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
APSE Discussions
Exam CESP Topic 3 Question 26 Discussion
APSE Exam CESP Topic 3 Question 26 Discussion
Actual exam question for APSE's CESP exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 3
[All CESP Questions]
A benefits analysis should include a description of:
A
the Work Opportunity Tax Credit
B
the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)
C
the benefits offered by an employer
D
all public benefits received by the job seeker.
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
D
by
Bernardine
at
Sep 16, 2024, 01:42 PM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium CESP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Stefania
1 months ago
I'm just here for the free donuts they promised at the end of the exam. Wait, what was the question again?
upvoted
0
times
...
Aja
1 months ago
C is the way to go. Keeping it focused on the employer's benefits is the key to a solid analysis.
upvoted
0
times
Melvin
10 days ago
Agreed, it gives a clear picture of what the job seeker can expect from the employer.
upvoted
0
times
...
Eladia
11 days ago
Exactly, focusing on the employer's benefits is crucial for a thorough analysis.
upvoted
0
times
...
Sunny
21 days ago
C) the benefits offered by an employer
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Carissa
2 months ago
I think it should also include all public benefits received by the job seeker. That way we can have a complete picture of the job seeker's financial situation.
upvoted
0
times
...
Rodolfo
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm going with D. Gotta make sure we cover all the bases, even if it's a bit overkill.
upvoted
0
times
Tess
1 months ago
Yeah, it's important to cover all the bases when conducting a benefits analysis.
upvoted
0
times
...
Tien
1 months ago
I agree, it's better to include all public benefits received by the job seeker.
upvoted
0
times
...
Leanna
1 months ago
I think D is a good choice, we want to be thorough in our analysis.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Tyisha
2 months ago
Definitely C. Why would we need to include all public benefits received by the job seeker? That's just irrelevant information.
upvoted
0
times
...
Christa
2 months ago
I agree with Boris. It's important to consider the benefits offered by the employer when analyzing the overall compensation package.
upvoted
0
times
...
Anastacia
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. The benefits analysis should focus on the benefits offered by the employer, not public benefits.
upvoted
0
times
Elise
16 days ago
Thanks for clarifying, I see now why the focus should be on the benefits offered by the employer.
upvoted
0
times
...
Jenelle
17 days ago
Actually, the correct answer is C) the benefits offered by an employer.
upvoted
0
times
...
Jerry
21 days ago
I think it's important to consider all public benefits received by the job seeker as well.
upvoted
0
times
...
Lemuel
30 days ago
I agree, the benefits analysis should definitely include the benefits offered by the employer.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Boris
2 months ago
I think a benefits analysis should include the benefits offered by an employer.
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Stefania
1 months agoAja
1 months agoMelvin
10 days agoEladia
11 days agoSunny
21 days agoCarissa
2 months agoRodolfo
2 months agoTess
1 months agoTien
1 months agoLeanna
1 months agoTyisha
2 months agoChrista
2 months agoAnastacia
2 months agoElise
16 days agoJenelle
17 days agoJerry
21 days agoLemuel
30 days agoBoris
2 months ago