Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Appian Exam ACD100 Topic 3 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Appian's ACD100 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 3
[All ACD100 Questions]

A feature is being deployed to the test environment.

In which environment is unit testing performed for the feature?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Referencing another local variable creates a dependency between the two variables and ensures that the referenced variable is always evaluated first.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Tandra
6 months ago
Hold up, is this a trick question? I bet the answer is none of the above, and we have to write our own custom code to do this. That's how they get you, you know.
upvoted 0 times
Hermila
5 months ago
Let's double check the requirements before jumping to conclusions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
5 months ago
Yeah, it does seem like a tricky question. Custom code might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
5 months ago
I think you might be right, we might have to write custom code for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
5 months ago
D) refreshOnVarChange:local!numberOfCustomers
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
5 months ago
C) refreshOnReferencedVarChange: true
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
5 months ago
B) refreshOnReferencedVarChange: false
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
5 months ago
A) refreshAlways:true
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
6 months ago
Bah, who needs to keep track of the original value? Just use the new one, it's more exciting that way!
upvoted 0 times
Dorothy
5 months ago
Nah, I prefer using the new value, keeps things interesting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
5 months ago
I agree, it can be useful for comparison later on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
5 months ago
I think it's important to keep track of the original value.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tasia
6 months ago
Ooh, I bet option A is the one! Refreshing the variable all the time sounds like the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option D seems to make the most sense to me, since it directly references the variable we're interested in.
upvoted 0 times
Lera
5 months ago
Yeah, that could work. Let's go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
6 months ago
That's a good point. Maybe we should go with option C instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
6 months ago
But what if the variable changes before we compare?
upvoted 0 times
...
William
6 months ago
I think option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raina
6 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think refreshOnReferencedVarChange: true could also work for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe refreshOnVarChange:local!numberOfCustomers is the best option to capture the original value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
7 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Refreshing the variable whenever the referenced variable changes is the best way to keep the original value up-to-date.
upvoted 0 times
Lindy
6 months ago
True, option C provides a more general approach to tracking changes in the variable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
6 months ago
I think option D might be too specific, option C covers all changes to the referenced variable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
6 months ago
But wouldn't option D also work since it specifically references the variable we want to track?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
6 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dudley
7 months ago
I think we should use refreshOnReferencedVarChange: false for the new variable.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel