Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APMG-International Exam AgilePM-Practitioner Topic 2 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's Agile Project Management (AgilePM) Practitioner exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 2
[All Agile Project Management (AgilePM) Practitioner Questions]

Answer the following questions about the tracking and control activities carried out within the project.

Decide whether each activity has been applied appropriately and select the response that supports your decision.

During Foundations, the key stakeholders had very different views about the content and prioritisation for the high-level requirements. As a result, the Project Manager

organized a Facilitated Workshop with the project team to discuss and agree the requirements.

Is this an appropriate application of Agile Project Management for this project?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Jonell at Aug 02, 2024, 04:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AgilePM-Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Jennie
1 months ago
Yes, I see your point. Involving stakeholders early on can help prevent misunderstandings and ensure alignment with project goals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliott
2 months ago
I agree with option A. It's important to involve stakeholders in requirement discussions for better communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
2 months ago
B) Yes, because this will allow each team member working in a Timebox to raise any issues which may hinder their progress.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
2 months ago
Haha, early and frequent delivery won't do much if the team doesn't even understand the requirements! C is definitely not the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Alida
2 months ago
Haha, early and frequent delivery won't do much if the team doesn't even understand the requirements! C is definitely not the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
2 months ago
A) Yes, because discussing requirements in the presence of project stakeholders will promote communication and buy-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elliott
2 months ago
A) Yes, because discussing requirements in the presence of project stakeholders will promote communication and buy-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
2 months ago
I'm not sure a Timebox is the right approach for this project since the stakeholders have such different views. Option B doesn't seem relevant.
upvoted 0 times
Esteban
2 months ago
D) No, because a Review Session should have been scheduled to enable the Solution Development Team to validate their understanding of the stakeholders' expectations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
2 months ago
C) No, because early and frequent delivery of the product features will on its own be sufficient to maintain engagement with the stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
2 months ago
A) Yes, because discussing requirements in the presence of project stakeholders will promote communication and buy-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Evelynn
2 months ago
A facilitated workshop is a great way to align the team on requirements. Discussing them upfront with stakeholders promotes buy-in, so I think option A is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Sherrell
1 months ago
A facilitated workshop is a great way to align the team on requirements. Discussing them upfront with stakeholders promotes buy-in, so I think option A is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
2 months ago
B) Yes, because this will allow each team member working in a Timebox to raise any issues which may hinder their progress.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
2 months ago
A) Yes, because discussing requirements in the presence of project stakeholders will promote communication and buy-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel