SIMULATION
A financial services company is launching a new banking product for which the sponsors have set a challenging timeline for an initial launch. The stakeholders have provided a list of conflicting requirements to be included in the new product design and build.
The project manager has decided to deliver the project in an iterative life cycle due to the time constraints.
Part A: State two reasons why an iterative approach would benefit solutions development in this scenario.
Faster delivery of prioritized features.
Flexibility to adapt to evolving stakeholder requirements.
Part B: Explain three requirement prioritization approaches the project team could focus on to meet the deadline in this scenario.
MoSCoW Method: Categorizes requirements as 'Must Have,' 'Should Have,' 'Could Have,' and 'Won't Have,' focusing on essential features.
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Focuses on implementing high-value, low-cost features first.
Value-Risk Matrix: Balances high-value requirements with low risk to ensure a feasible and impactful scope.
Iterative approaches allow for incremental delivery and continuous stakeholder feedback, which is essential for resolving conflicting requirements within tight timelines. Prioritization techniques ensure limited resources are used effectively.
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!