BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APICS Exam CPIM-Part-2 Topic 5 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CPIM-Part-2 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 5
[All CPIM-Part-2 Questions]

The most appropriate production output reporting method for repetitive manufacturing is:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The most appropriate production output reporting method for repetitive manufacturing is backflush.Repetitive manufacturing is a production system where the same or similar products are produced in large quantities or in a continuous flow1.Backflush is a method of reporting output and consumption of materials at the end of the production process, rather than at each operation or stage2. Backflush can simplify and streamline the production output reporting process, as it eliminates the need for tracking and recording each individual transaction or movement of materials and components.Backflush can also reduce the paperwork, errors, and costs associated with production output reporting2.

The other options are not as appropriate as backflush for repetitive manufacturing.Operation-by-operation is a method of reporting output and consumption of materials at each operation or stage of the production process3. This method can provide more detailed and accurate information about the production performance and costs, but it can also be more complex and time-consuming, as it requires tracking and recording each individual transaction or movement of materials and components.Count point is a method of reporting output and consumption of materials at selected points or milestones in the production process4. This method can provide a balance between detail and simplicity, but it can also introduce errors or discrepancies, as it requires estimating or extrapolating the output and consumption of materials between the count points.Job tickets are documents that record the time, materials, and costs associated with a specific job or order5. This method can provide more flexibility and customization, but it can also be more suitable for job shop or batch production systems, where different products are produced in small quantities or on demand.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Phil
2 months ago
I bet the exam writer is just trying to trick us. What if the answer is 'all of the above'? You know they love doing that.
upvoted 0 times
Sylvia
10 days ago
I think it could be job tickets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
11 days ago
I'm not sure, maybe it's count point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
12 days ago
I think the answer is operation-by-operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
13 days ago
I think backflush is the correct method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
19 days ago
Maybe it's job tickets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
24 days ago
I'm not sure, it could also be count point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
26 days ago
I think the answer is operation-by-operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosalyn
2 months ago
I think backflush is the best option, it helps in reducing inventory inaccuracies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
2 months ago
I prefer count point method, it's simpler and more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
2 months ago
I agree with Verlene, operation-by-operation provides more detailed tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
2 months ago
Backflush, definitely. It's like a magic trick for production reporting - bam, all the numbers just appear! Very convenient.
upvoted 0 times
Wenona
1 months ago
I prefer operation-by-operation, it gives a more detailed view of the production process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
1 months ago
I agree, backflush is so efficient for repetitive manufacturing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Queen
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Operation-by-operation seems like a pretty thorough approach. Maybe I should double-check the details on that one.
upvoted 0 times
Raylene
1 months ago
I think count point could also be a good option for tracking production output in repetitive manufacturing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
2 months ago
I agree, operation-by-operation provides a detailed breakdown of production output.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kizzy
2 months ago
I think option D is the way to go. Backflush is just so efficient for repetitive manufacturing, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Nakisha
1 months ago
I think operation-by-operation is more accurate in tracking production output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
1 months ago
Count point reporting can also be useful for monitoring production in repetitive manufacturing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
1 months ago
I agree, backflush is definitely the most efficient method for repetitive manufacturing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Verlene
2 months ago
I think the most appropriate method is operation-by-operation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel