BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APICS Exam CPIM-Part-2 Topic 2 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CPIM-Part-2 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 2
[All CPIM-Part-2 Questions]

Fishbone diagrams would help a service organization determine:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

A fishbone diagram, also known as a cause-and-effect diagram or an Ishikawa diagram, is a tool for identifying and analyzing the possible causes of a problem or an effect. It is often used in quality management to find the root causes of defects or errors. A fishbone diagram has a main branch that represents the problem or effect, and several sub-branches that represent the categories of causes, such as people, processes, equipment, materials, environment, etc. Each category can have further sub-branches that represent more specific causes. A fishbone diagram would help a service organization determine the source of a quality-of-service issue by allowing them to visualize and organize the potential factors that contribute to the problem and identify the most likely cause.Reference: CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Domain 8: Manage Quality, Continuous Improvement, and Technology, Section 8.1: Quality Management Concepts and Tools, p. 59-60.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Leota
27 days ago
Option D is just silly. Decomposing customer returns with seasonality? That's more of a statistical analysis kind of thing, not a fishbone diagram.
upvoted 0 times
Dahlia
2 days ago
B) the source of a quality-of-service issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
4 days ago
A: I agree, option D does seem out of place for a fishbone diagram.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
7 days ago
A) the source of a quality-of-service issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shenika
1 months ago
Hah, Option C is a bit of a stretch. I doubt fishbones would be used to compare employee performance. That's what performance reviews are for!
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Wouldn't Option A also be a valid use case? I mean, understanding customer needs is key for any service org.
upvoted 0 times
Annita
11 days ago
Definitely, understanding customer needs is crucial, but for this specific purpose, Option B is the most appropriate for a service organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
14 days ago
Yeah, I agree. Option A may be important, but in this context, Option B is the best choice for using fishbone diagrams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
14 days ago
I see your point, but in this case, Option B is the most relevant for determining the source of a quality-of-service issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
21 days ago
Option B is correct. Fishbone diagrams are used to identify the root cause of quality issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merrilee
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think A) the proper level of service for a customer segment could also be determined using fishbone diagrams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
2 months ago
Option B seems like the obvious choice here. Fishbone diagrams are all about identifying the root causes of quality issues.
upvoted 0 times
Erasmo
23 days ago
I see your point, but I still think option B is the most relevant. It's all about finding the source of quality issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
24 days ago
I think option A could also be a possibility. Fishbone diagrams can help determine the proper level of service for different customer segments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
29 days ago
I agree, option B is the best choice. Fishbone diagrams are great for pinpointing quality-of-service issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorean
2 months ago
I agree with Devora. Fishbone diagrams are used to identify root causes of problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) the source of a quality-of-service issue.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel