Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APICS Exam CPIM-8.0 Topic 8 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CPIM-8.0 exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 8
[All CPIM-8.0 Questions]

Which of the following systems would be the most cost-efficient for inventory management of a low value item?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Periodic review is a system that determines the order quantity and reorder point for an item based on the inventory position at fixed intervals. This system is suitable for inventory management of low value items, as it reduces the ordering and holding costs, simplifies the ordering process, and allows for grouping orders. Therefore, option C is correct. Option A is incorrect because order point is a system that triggers an order when the inventory level falls below a predetermined level. This system requires continuous monitoring of inventory levels, which may not be cost-efficient for low value items. Option B is incorrect because material requirements planning (MRP) is a system that calculates the requirements for components and materials based on the demand for end items. This system is more appropriate for items with dependent demand, rather than independent demand. Option D is incorrect because economic order quantity (EOQ) is a system that determines the optimal order quantity that minimizes the total ordering and holding costs. This system assumes constant and known demand and lead time, which may not be realistic for some items.Reference: CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, Section E: Plan and Manage Inventory, Subsection E.2: Inventory Management Methods, p. 53.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Carmela
5 days ago
I see your point, Dierdre. It really depends on the specific characteristics of the item being managed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
7 days ago
That's true, Periodic review could be more practical for items with low value and less demand variability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
7 days ago
A classic case of 'keep it simple, stupid'. I'm going with C. Periodic review. No need to overthink it for low-value items.
upvoted 0 times
Magdalene
3 days ago
I agree, periodic review is definitely the way to go for low-value items.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryann
8 days ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. MRP or EOQ... Decisions, decisions. Maybe I should just ask the professor to toss a coin for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
19 days ago
But wouldn't Periodic review be more suitable for low value items?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
23 days ago
I agree with Xuan, EOQ takes into account the holding cost and ordering cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
23 days ago
D. Economic order quantity (EOQ) is the way to go. It might be a bit more complicated, but it'll optimize your inventory costs in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
Lenna
4 hours ago
D) Economic order quantity (EOQ)
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
2 days ago
C) Periodic review
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
6 days ago
B) Material requirements planning (MRP)
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
11 days ago
A) Order point
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Xuan
29 days ago
I think the most cost-efficient system would be Economic order quantity (EOQ).
upvoted 0 times
...
Theresia
1 months ago
I'd go with option C. Periodic review seems like the most cost-efficient for low-value items. You don't want to waste time and money on complex systems for cheap stuff, right?
upvoted 0 times
Natalie
15 days ago
I think Economic order quantity (EOQ) would be more suitable for high-value items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
22 days ago
I agree, periodic review is definitely the way to go for low-value items.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel