Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
API Discussions
Exam API-580 Topic 1 Question 97 Discussion
API Exam API-580 Topic 1 Question 97 Discussion
Actual exam question for API's API-580 exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 1
[All API-580 Questions]
Risk presented in quantitative risk analysis as a
A
Precise numeric value
B
Form of risk matrix
C
Form of event tree and fault tree
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
A
by
Domitila
at
Sep 16, 2024, 04:19 AM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium API-580 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Rachael
2 months ago
Well, I think it can also be represented as a form of event tree and fault tree.
upvoted
0
times
...
Marge
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe it is in the form of a risk matrix.
upvoted
0
times
...
Billye
3 months ago
Hmm, I'd say B. Risk matrices are the way to go – they're like the horoscopes of the risk analysis world. Always a good conversation starter.
upvoted
0
times
Frank
1 months ago
C) Form of event tree and fault tree
upvoted
0
times
...
My
2 months ago
B) Form of risk matrix
upvoted
0
times
...
Adelina
2 months ago
A) Precise numeric value
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Rachael
3 months ago
I think the risk presented in quantitative risk analysis is a precise numeric value.
upvoted
0
times
...
Louvenia
3 months ago
A, hands down. I want my risks to be as precise as possible. No room for guesswork here – just pure, unadulterated numbers.
upvoted
0
times
...
Eun
3 months ago
C, all the way. Event trees and fault trees are where it's at. Nothing beats a good ol' branching diagram to really understand the potential risks.
upvoted
0
times
...
Oneida
3 months ago
B, for sure. Risk matrices are the way to go – they give you a nice, visual representation of the potential risks. Plus, they look really professional.
upvoted
0
times
Joanna
2 months ago
Risk matrices can be helpful, but I find event trees and fault trees to be more comprehensive.
upvoted
0
times
...
Valda
2 months ago
I think precise numeric values are more accurate for assessing risk.
upvoted
0
times
...
Ronny
2 months ago
I prefer using event trees and fault trees for quantitative risk analysis.
upvoted
0
times
...
Leanna
2 months ago
I agree, risk matrices are great for visually understanding the potential risks.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Ryan
3 months ago
A precise numeric value? Sounds like the kind of thing accountants love. I'm more of a 'go with the flow' kind of guy, myself.
upvoted
0
times
Helaine
3 months ago
I agree, a precise numeric value can be too rigid for some situations. It's all about finding the right approach for each scenario.
upvoted
0
times
...
Olive
3 months ago
I prefer the form of a risk matrix, it helps me visualize the different levels of risk.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Rachael
2 months agoMarge
3 months agoBillye
3 months agoFrank
1 months agoMy
2 months agoAdelina
2 months agoRachael
3 months agoLouvenia
3 months agoEun
3 months agoOneida
3 months agoJoanna
2 months agoValda
2 months agoRonny
2 months agoLeanna
2 months agoRyan
3 months agoHelaine
3 months agoOlive
3 months ago