Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Oracle
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
American Planning Association Discussions
Exam AICP Topic 2 Question 80 Discussion
American Planning Association Exam AICP Topic 2 Question 80 Discussion
Actual exam question for American Planning Association's AICP exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 2
[All AICP Questions]
What case did Alfred Bettman argue?
A
South Burlington County NAACP v Township of Mount Laurel
B
Fasano v Board of Co. Commissioners of Washington Co.
C
Golden v Planning Board of the Town of Ramapo
D
Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co.
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
A
by
Elouise
at
Jul 11, 2024, 10:29 PM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium AICP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Gertude
1 days ago
I think Alfred Bettman argued in South Burlington County NAACP v Township of Mount Laurel.
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Gertude
1 days ago