MENU
What case did Alfred Bettman argue?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium AICP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
KI
Kiley
10 months ago
I thought he was involved in more than one case, though.
LI
Linn
11 months ago
Yup, definitely Mount Laurel. Big impact on zoning laws!
EL
Elbert
11 months ago
Wait, are you sure it wasn't the Ramapo case?
CH
Chantay
11 months ago
Totally agree, it was a landmark decision.
DE
Denise
11 months ago
He argued the Mount Laurel case!
BO
Bobbye
12 months ago
I’m pretty confident it’s the Mount Laurel case, but I might be mixing it up with something else I read.
CA
Carrol
12 months ago
I feel like I saw a practice question about Golden v Planning Board, but I can't recall if Bettman was part of it.
UL
Ulysses
12 months ago
I remember studying the Village of Euclid case, but I don't think Bettman was involved in that one.
ME
Merilyn
1 year ago
I think Alfred Bettman argued in the South Burlington County case, but I'm not entirely sure.
CH
Christoper
1 year ago
I'm a little confused on this one. Was Bettman involved in the Mount Laurel decision? Or was that a different case? I'll have to double-check my understanding of these important land use precedents.
NA
Nakisha
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Wasn't Bettman the lawyer who argued the Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co. case? That was a landmark zoning decision, if I recall correctly.
DE
Deeanna
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I know Bettman was involved in some important land use and zoning cases, but I'm having trouble remembering the specifics. I'll have to carefully review my notes.
EL
Elmira
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure this is asking about a case that Alfred Bettman argued, so I'll need to think back to the cases we covered in class. Let me see...
TE
Terrilyn
1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Bettman argued the Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co. case, which established the constitutionality of comprehensive zoning. That's a key case we covered in this unit, so I'm going with that.
ME
Melissa
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the label change only affects the child table, but I want to double-check that.
RE
Regenia
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The requirement to protect the backend server without removing the header has me stumped. I'll need to review the rewrite action types more closely to figure out the best approach.
ER
Erick
1 year ago
Wait, isn't Alfred Bettman the guy who invented the traffic light? *laughs* Just kidding, but seriously, I'm pretty sure it's Fasano v Board of Co. Commissioners of Washington Co. That was a big zoning case, right? *shrugs* Guess we'll see if I'm right on this one.
SY
Sylvie
1 year ago
Oh, really? I thought it was Fasano v Board of Co. Commissioners of Washington Co. Interesting.
TE
Tenesha
1 year ago
No, it was actually Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co.
RY
Ryann
1 year ago
Yeah, Alfred Bettman argued in Fasano v Board of Co. Commissioners of Washington Co.
KE
Keneth
1 year ago
Okay, let's see... Alfred Bettman, city planning... *snaps fingers* Got it! It's gotta be South Burlington County NAACP v Township of Mount Laurel. He was a big advocate for fair housing, if I remember correctly. *laughs* Man, I hope this isn't one of those 'name the case where the defendant won' kind of deals.
SH
Shaquana
1 year ago
That's correct! He was definitely a key figure in advocating for fair housing.
MA
Marci
1 year ago
Yeah, you're right! Alfred Bettman argued in South Burlington County NAACP v Township of Mount Laurel.
GE
Germaine
1 year ago
Hold up, wasn't Alfred Bettman the guy who literally wrote the book on city planning? If that's the case, my money's on Golden v Planning Board of the Town of Ramapo. That's gotta be it, right? *chuckles* Unless this is some kind of trick question...
GE
Gertude
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Let's look it up to be sure.
DE
Della
2 years ago
Hmm, Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co. sounds familiar, but I feel like I've heard the name Alfred Bettman before. Is that the one where he argued for more inclusive housing policies? Better double-check that one.
AP
Apolonia
2 years ago
I believe it was actually Fasano v Board of Co. Commissioners of Washington Co.
WE
Wendell
2 years ago
I'm pretty sure it was Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co. That landmark case established the legality of zoning laws, which is definitely something an urban planning exam would cover.
AS
Ashton
1 year ago
The Supreme Court upheld the zoning laws in that case.
AN
Angelo
1 year ago
Do you remember what the outcome of the case was?
VA
Valda
1 year ago
Yes, you're right. That case was about zoning laws.
DO
Dorsey
1 year ago
I think it was Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co.
GE
Gertude
2 years ago
I think Alfred Bettman argued in South Burlington County NAACP v Township of Mount Laurel.