Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

American Planning Association AICP Exam - Topic 2 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for American Planning Association's AICP exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 2
[All AICP Questions]

What case did Alfred Bettman argue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Elouise at Jul 11, 2024, 10:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AICP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kiley
4 months ago
I thought he was involved in more than one case, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
4 months ago
Yup, definitely Mount Laurel. Big impact on zoning laws!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
4 months ago
Wait, are you sure it wasn't the Ramapo case?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
5 months ago
Totally agree, it was a landmark decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
5 months ago
He argued the Mount Laurel case!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
5 months ago
I’m pretty confident it’s the Mount Laurel case, but I might be mixing it up with something else I read.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carrol
5 months ago
I feel like I saw a practice question about Golden v Planning Board, but I can't recall if Bettman was part of it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
5 months ago
I remember studying the Village of Euclid case, but I don't think Bettman was involved in that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
6 months ago
I think Alfred Bettman argued in the South Burlington County case, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
6 months ago
I'm a little confused on this one. Was Bettman involved in the Mount Laurel decision? Or was that a different case? I'll have to double-check my understanding of these important land use precedents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Wasn't Bettman the lawyer who argued the Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co. case? That was a landmark zoning decision, if I recall correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
6 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I know Bettman was involved in some important land use and zoning cases, but I'm having trouble remembering the specifics. I'll have to carefully review my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
6 months ago
I'm pretty sure this is asking about a case that Alfred Bettman argued, so I'll need to think back to the cases we covered in class. Let me see...
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
6 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Bettman argued the Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co. case, which established the constitutionality of comprehensive zoning. That's a key case we covered in this unit, so I'm going with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
6 months ago
I'm pretty sure the label change only affects the child table, but I want to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The requirement to protect the backend server without removing the header has me stumped. I'll need to review the rewrite action types more closely to figure out the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
11 months ago
Wait, isn't Alfred Bettman the guy who invented the traffic light? *laughs* Just kidding, but seriously, I'm pretty sure it's Fasano v Board of Co. Commissioners of Washington Co. That was a big zoning case, right? *shrugs* Guess we'll see if I'm right on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Sylvie
9 months ago
Oh, really? I thought it was Fasano v Board of Co. Commissioners of Washington Co. Interesting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
9 months ago
No, it was actually Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
10 months ago
Yeah, Alfred Bettman argued in Fasano v Board of Co. Commissioners of Washington Co.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keneth
11 months ago
Okay, let's see... Alfred Bettman, city planning... *snaps fingers* Got it! It's gotta be South Burlington County NAACP v Township of Mount Laurel. He was a big advocate for fair housing, if I remember correctly. *laughs* Man, I hope this isn't one of those 'name the case where the defendant won' kind of deals.
upvoted 0 times
Shaquana
11 months ago
That's correct! He was definitely a key figure in advocating for fair housing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
11 months ago
Yeah, you're right! Alfred Bettman argued in South Burlington County NAACP v Township of Mount Laurel.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Germaine
11 months ago
Hold up, wasn't Alfred Bettman the guy who literally wrote the book on city planning? If that's the case, my money's on Golden v Planning Board of the Town of Ramapo. That's gotta be it, right? *chuckles* Unless this is some kind of trick question...
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Let's look it up to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
12 months ago
Hmm, Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co. sounds familiar, but I feel like I've heard the name Alfred Bettman before. Is that the one where he argued for more inclusive housing policies? Better double-check that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
12 months ago
I believe it was actually Fasano v Board of Co. Commissioners of Washington Co.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
12 months ago
I'm pretty sure it was Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co. That landmark case established the legality of zoning laws, which is definitely something an urban planning exam would cover.
upvoted 0 times
Ashton
10 months ago
The Supreme Court upheld the zoning laws in that case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
11 months ago
Do you remember what the outcome of the case was?
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
11 months ago
Yes, you're right. That case was about zoning laws.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
11 months ago
I think it was Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gertude
12 months ago
I think Alfred Bettman argued in South Burlington County NAACP v Township of Mount Laurel.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel