Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

American Bankers Association Exam CRCM Topic 4 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for American Bankers Association's Certified Regulatory Compliance Manager exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 4
[All Certified Regulatory Compliance Manager Questions]

Which of the following is MOST effective in strengthening an anti-money laundering program involving cash transactions?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Nathalie
27 days ago
Ah, the age-old question of how to catch the money launderers. Maybe we should just install a giant cash-sniffing dog at the entrance. Woof!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
28 days ago
Option A? Really? Who deposits $25,000 in cash these days? That's just asking to get robbed. Pass.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
29 days ago
Option B sounds like a lot of paperwork, but it might be worth it to have a paper trail. I'm not sure I trust the bank tellers to catch everything.
upvoted 0 times
Daron
7 days ago
User 3: Daron, I think monitoring cash transactions of less than $10,000 for suspicious patterns is also important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
10 days ago
User 2: Francesco, I think having a paper trail is important for tracking cash transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
19 days ago
User 1: I agree, option B does seem like a lot of paperwork.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kasandra
1 months ago
I agree with Francine, option C would provide more detailed information for reporting suspicious transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
1 months ago
But completing SAR worksheets on all cash transactions of $5,000 or more would help identify suspicious activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
1 months ago
I disagree, I think option C is the way to go. Completing SAR worksheets on cash transactions of $5,000 or more is crucial for reporting any suspicious activity.
upvoted 0 times
Delmy
19 days ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
24 days ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jaime
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
2 months ago
I think option D is the most effective. Monitoring suspicious patterns, even in smaller transactions, can help catch potential money laundering activities.
upvoted 0 times
Madalyn
1 months ago
User 2: I think reviewing all deposits of $25,000 or more would also be effective in strengthening the program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, monitoring smaller transactions is key to catching suspicious activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francine
2 months ago
I think option C is the most effective.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel