Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon Exam SCS-C02 Topic 8 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SCS-C02 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 8
[All SCS-C02 Questions]

A company is storing data in Amazon S3 Glacier. A security engineer implemented a new vault lock policy for 10 TB of data and called the initiate-vault-lock operation 12 hours ago. The audit team identified a typo in the policy that is allowing unintended access to the vault.

What is the MOST cost-effective way to correct this error?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The most cost-effective way to correct a typo in a vault lock policy during the 24-hour initiation period is to call the abort-vault-lock operation. This action stops the vault lock process, allowing the security engineer to correct the policy and re-initiate the vault lock with the corrected policy. This approach avoids the need for data transfer or creating a new vault, thus minimizing costs and operational overhead.


by Agustin at Jul 18, 2024, 09:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SCS-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Van
5 months ago
Option C? Are you kidding me? That's just sweeping the problem under the rug. Nah, D is definitely the way to go, clean and simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
5 months ago
Haha, someone's got some explaining to do for that typo! I'd go with D, gotta love those AWS CLI commands, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ailene
5 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I reckon D is the most efficient way to fix the issue. Calling abort-vault-lock and then re-initiating it just seems like a waste of time and resources.
upvoted 0 times
Rosita
3 months ago
Updating the policy and calling the initiate-vault-lock operation again makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
4 months ago
I would go with option D as well, it's the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
4 months ago
Yeah, I think updating the policy and reapplying it is the best course of action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matilda
4 months ago
I agree, option D seems like the most efficient way to correct the error.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lili
5 months ago
Option B sounds like a lot of work and unnecessary data transfer. I'd rather go with the simpler solution of just updating the policy and reapplying it.
upvoted 0 times
Gregoria
5 months ago
B: Yeah, updating the policy and reapplying it is definitely the way to go in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
5 months ago
A: I agree, option D seems like the most efficient way to correct the error.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
5 months ago
I see your point, Vincent. However, updating the policy and reapplying the vault lock might be quicker and more efficient in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
5 months ago
Hmm, I think option D is the way to go. Updating the policy and calling the initiate-vault-lock operation again is the most cost-effective approach, without having to copy all the data or delete the vault.
upvoted 0 times
Dean
4 months ago
Updating the policy and reapplying it sounds like the simplest solution in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
4 months ago
Yeah, it's the most cost-effective way to correct the error without causing too much disruption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
5 months ago
I agree, option D seems like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vincent
5 months ago
But wouldn't copying the data to a new bucket and creating a new vault be safer in case the typo caused any security issues?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
5 months ago
I agree with Karina, aborting the vault lock and updating the policy seems like the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karina
6 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel