Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam SAP-C02 Topic 2 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SAP-C02 exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 2
[All SAP-C02 Questions]

A company is migrating a monolithic on-premises .NET Framework production application to AWS. Application demand will grow exponentially in the next 6 months. The company must ensure that the application can scale appropriately.

The application currently connects to a Microsoft SQL Server transactional database. The company has well-documented source code for the application. Some business logic is contained within stored procedures.

A solutions architect must recommend a solution to redesign the application to meet the growth in demand.

Which solution will meet this requirement MOST cost-effectively?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Genevieve
26 days ago
Wow, these options are making my head spin! I need a coffee break before I can think about this any further.
upvoted 0 times
Bulah
11 days ago
Don't worry, take your time to relax and recharge with some coffee.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Blair
1 months ago
Option D is tempting, but I'm not sure about the feasibility of modifying all the stored procedures. Might be a bit of a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
Derick
5 days ago
D: I see your point about modifying stored procedures, but Amazon Aurora Serverless v2 could be worth it for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
6 days ago
C: Option C seems interesting with AWS Fargate and Amazon DynamoDB Accelerator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
12 days ago
B: I agree, using Amazon RDS for SQL Server will also help with data storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
19 days ago
A: Option A sounds like a good choice for scalability with EC2 Auto Scaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Junita
2 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A is better because it deploys EC2 instances in a cluster placement group for better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more cost-effective as it decouples the application into microservices and uses AWS Lambda functions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
2 months ago
Option C is interesting, but using DynamoDB Accelerator for the stored procedures seems risky. I'd stick with a more traditional database approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
2 months ago
I'd go with Option B. Elastic Beanstalk makes it easy to manage the microservices, and RDS for MySQL is a reliable database solution.
upvoted 0 times
Ula
6 days ago
Using AWS Application Migration Service will make the migration process smoother.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
20 days ago
RDS for MySQL is a solid database option for storing data and stored procedures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
24 days ago
I agree, managing microservices with Elastic Beanstalk is convenient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rochell
1 months ago
Option B sounds like a good choice. Elastic Beanstalk is user-friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ivan
2 months ago
Option A seems the most cost-effective as it uses EC2 Spot Instances and a scalable microservices architecture. Deploying in a cluster placement group should also help with performance.
upvoted 0 times
Victor
1 months ago
I think Option D could also be a good choice. Decoupling the application into microservices and using AWS Lambda functions could provide flexibility for future growth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willis
2 months ago
I agree, Option A does seem like the most cost-effective solution. Using EC2 Spot Instances and a microservices architecture should help with scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Junita
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it uses Amazon API Gateway APIs and EC2 Spot Instances for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel