Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam MLS-C01 Topic 4 Question 109 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's MLS-C01 exam
Question #: 109
Topic #: 4
[All MLS-C01 Questions]

A business to business (B2B) ecommerce company wants to develop a fair and equitable risk mitigation strategy to reject potentially fraudulent transactions. The company wants to reject fraudulent transactions despite the possibility of losing some profitable transactions or customers.

Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational effort?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Amazon Fraud Detector is a managed service designed to detect potentially fraudulent online activities, such as transactions. It uses machine learning and business rules to classify activities as fraudulent or legitimate, minimizing the need for custom model training. By using the Amazon Fraud Detector prediction API, the company can automatically approve or reject transactions flagged as fraudulent, implementing an efficient risk mitigation strategy without extensive operational effort.

This approach requires minimal setup and effectively allows the company to block fraudulent transactions with high confidence, addressing the business's need to balance risk mitigation and customer impact.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Justine
1 days ago
Option B sounds like the most comprehensive solution, but it might be overkill for this scenario. Hmm, tough call.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
8 days ago
I agree with Eve, option C seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
15 days ago
But option C allows for automatic approval or denial based on Fraud Detector's identification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
19 days ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
20 days ago
I'd go with option D. Keeping human oversight on the process is important, even if it requires a bit more effort.
upvoted 0 times
Terrilyn
8 days ago
But using a custom fraud detection model could potentially be more accurate in identifying fraudulent transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
12 days ago
I agree, having human oversight can help catch any false positives that the system might miss.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barrett
1 months ago
Option C seems like the easiest and most straightforward solution. Let the Fraud Detector do all the heavy lifting!
upvoted 0 times
Tamekia
7 days ago
I agree, using the Amazon Fraud Detector prediction API to approve or deny activities identified as fraudulent sounds efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
7 days ago
It's important to have a reliable system in place to catch fraudulent activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
10 days ago
Using the Fraud Detector prediction API would definitely save us time and effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
15 days ago
I agree, option C sounds like the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettye
22 days ago
Option C seems like the easiest and most straightforward solution. Let the Fraud Detector do all the heavy lifting!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eve
1 months ago
I think option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel