Amazon Exam DOP-C01 Topic 6 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's DOP-C01 exam

Question #: 95
Topic #: 6

A company requires an RPO of 2 hours and an RTO of 10 minutes for its data and application at all times An application uses a MySQL database and Amazon EC2 web servers. The development learn needs a strategy for failover and disaster recovery

Which combination of deployment strategies will meet these requirements? {Select TWO)

ACreate an Amazon Aurora cluster in one Availability Zone across multiple Regions as the data store Use Aurora's automatic recovery capabilities in the event of a discluster.

BCreate an Amazon Aurora global database m two Regions as the data store In the event of a failure, promote the secondary Region as the master for the application

CCreate an Amazon Aurora multi-master cluster across multiple Regions as the data store Use an Network Load Balancer to balance the database traffic in different Regions.

DSet up the application in two Regions and use Amazon Route 53 failover-based routing that points to the Application Load Balancers in both Regions Use health checks to determine the availability in a given Region. Use Auto Scaling groups in each Region to adjust capacity based on demand

ESet up the application m two Regions and use a multi-Region Auto Scaling group behind Application Load Balancers to manage the capacity based on demand in the event of a disaster, adjust the Auto Scaling group's desired instance count to increase baseline capacity in the failover Region.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, E

by Quentin at Jun 23, 2024, 03:24 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DOP-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lang

7 months ago

I'm torn between options D and E. Both seem to address the requirements, but I'm curious to see how they would perform under a real-world stress test. Anyone got a crystal ball to predict the future?

upvoted 0 times

Kirk

7 months ago

I agree, but Option E with multi-Region Auto Scaling could provide better scalability in case of a disaster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margo

7 months ago

Option D seems like the safer choice for failover with Route 53 routing and health checks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dewitt

7 months ago

That's a good point, Lashon. Option E does provide flexibility in managing capacity during a disaster. It's definitely worth considering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashon

8 months ago

I'm not sure about option D. I think option E might be a better choice because it allows for adjusting capacity based on demand in the event of a disaster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlene

8 months ago

Option C seems a bit overkill for this use case. Do we really need a multi-master Aurora cluster and a Network Load Balancer just to handle a 2-hour RPO and 10-minute RTO? Seems like a lot of complexity.

upvoted 0 times

Stevie

7 months ago

D: Let's go with setting up the application in two Regions and using Route 53 failover-based routing with Auto Scaling groups.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shantay

7 months ago

C: Yeah, D and E seem more practical for meeting our RPO and RTO.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joanna

7 months ago

B: I think we should consider options D and E instead.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margurite

7 months ago

A: I agree, option C does seem like overkill for our requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcom

8 months ago

Option A is like trying to catch a unicorn with a butterfly net. Aurora in multiple Regions? Automatic recovery? That's some serious voodoo magic right there.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maurine

8 months ago

I agree with you, Dewitt. Option B ensures data replication across multiple Regions for failover, and option D provides failover-based routing for the application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eladia

8 months ago

Option D sounds like the most robust solution to meet the RTO and RPO requirements. Using Route 53 failover-based routing and health checks to determine availability is a smart approach.

upvoted 0 times