Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam DOP-C01 Topic 6 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's DOP-C01 exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 6
[All DOP-C01 Questions]

A company has multiple development groups working in a single shared AWS account. The Senior Manager of the groups wants to be alerted via a third-party API call when the creation of resources approaches the service limits for the account.

Which solution will accomplish this with the LEAST amount of development effort?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lang
9 months ago
I'm torn between options D and E. Both seem to address the requirements, but I'm curious to see how they would perform under a real-world stress test. Anyone got a crystal ball to predict the future?
upvoted 0 times
Kirk
8 months ago
I agree, but Option E with multi-Region Auto Scaling could provide better scalability in case of a disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
8 months ago
Option D seems like the safer choice for failover with Route 53 routing and health checks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dewitt
9 months ago
That's a good point, Lashon. Option E does provide flexibility in managing capacity during a disaster. It's definitely worth considering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
9 months ago
I'm not sure about option D. I think option E might be a better choice because it allows for adjusting capacity based on demand in the event of a disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
9 months ago
Option C seems a bit overkill for this use case. Do we really need a multi-master Aurora cluster and a Network Load Balancer just to handle a 2-hour RPO and 10-minute RTO? Seems like a lot of complexity.
upvoted 0 times
Stevie
8 months ago
D: Let's go with setting up the application in two Regions and using Route 53 failover-based routing with Auto Scaling groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
8 months ago
C: Yeah, D and E seem more practical for meeting our RPO and RTO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
9 months ago
B: I think we should consider options D and E instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
9 months ago
A: I agree, option C does seem like overkill for our requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malcom
9 months ago
Option A is like trying to catch a unicorn with a butterfly net. Aurora in multiple Regions? Automatic recovery? That's some serious voodoo magic right there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
10 months ago
I agree with you, Dewitt. Option B ensures data replication across multiple Regions for failover, and option D provides failover-based routing for the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
10 months ago
Option D sounds like the most robust solution to meet the RTO and RPO requirements. Using Route 53 failover-based routing and health checks to determine availability is a smart approach.
upvoted 0 times
Vinnie
9 months ago
Agreed, having the application set up in two Regions with Auto Scaling groups for capacity adjustment seems like a reliable failover strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
9 months ago
Using Route 53 failover-based routing and health checks to determine availability is a smart approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
9 months ago
Agreed, using Route 53 failover-based routing and health checks is a smart approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
9 months ago
Option D sounds like the most robust solution to meet the RTO and RPO requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
9 months ago
Option D sounds like the most robust solution to meet the RTO and RPO requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dewitt
10 months ago
I think options B and D could work well for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel