BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam CLF-C02 Topic 4 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's CLF-C02 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 4
[All CLF-C02 Questions]

A company is building a new application on AWS. The company needs the application to remain available if an individual application component fails.

Which design principle should the company use to meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Loose coupling is a design principle that involves reducing dependencies between application components so that they can operate independently. This approach ensures that the failure of one component does not affect the availability of the others, thereby improving the application's fault tolerance and resilience. Disposable resources, automation, and rightsizing are valuable principles in cloud architecture, but they do not directly address the requirement of remaining available despite the failure of an individual component like loose coupling does. References:

AWS Well-Architected Framework - Design Principles


Contribute your Thoughts:

Novella
22 days ago
Loose coupling? That's how I describe my relationship with my alarm clock every morning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
24 days ago
Rightsizing? I thought that was just my daily struggle with finding the perfect-fitting pants.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
27 days ago
Automation? Isn't that just the fancy way of saying 'I let the robots do the work'?
upvoted 0 times
Johna
2 days ago
In this case, the company should use loose coupling to ensure availability if a component fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
14 days ago
Yes, automation is like having robots do the work for you.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hyman
29 days ago
Disposable resources? I thought that was just my old high school notebooks.
upvoted 0 times
Camellia
1 days ago
B: Yeah, that way the application can remain available if a component fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
13 days ago
A: I think the company should use loose coupling.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zita
1 months ago
I'm not sure about loose coupling. Maybe automation could also help in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quiana
1 months ago
Loose coupling? That's what I do with my socks every morning!
upvoted 0 times
German
6 days ago
User 4: Haha, that's a funny way to think about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
16 days ago
I always try to keep my socks loosely coupled too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
27 days ago
Yeah, it helps the application stay available if one component fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
29 days ago
Loose coupling sounds like a good idea for the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joye
1 months ago
I agree with Launa. Loose coupling helps in ensuring availability even if a component fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
2 months ago
I think the company should use loose coupling to meet the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel