A company has established connectivity between its on-premises data center in Paris, France, and the AWS Cloud by using an AWS Direct Connect connection. The company uses a transit VIF that connects the Direct Connect connection with a transit gateway that is hosted in the Europe (Paris) Region. The company hosts workloads in private subnets in several VPCs that are attached to the transit gateway.
The company recently acquired another corporation that hosts workloads on premises in an office building in Tokyo, Japan. The company needs to migrate the workloads from the Tokyo office to AWS. These workloads must have access to the company's existing workloads in Paris. The company also must establish connectivity between the Tokyo office building and the Paris data center.
In the Asia Pacific (Tokyo) Region, the company creates a new VPC with private subnets for migration of the workloads. The workload migration must be completed in 5 days. The workloads cannot be directly accessible from the internet.
Which set of steps should a network engineer take to meet these requirements?
Option C is the best solution because it allows the company to use transit gateways to connect the VPCs in different regions and the on-premises sites. Transit gateways support inter-region peering and VPN attachments, which enable secure and scalable connectivity. Option A is not valid because public subnets are not suitable for workloads that cannot be directly accessible from the internet. Option B is not valid because Direct Connect connections take longer than 5 days to provision.
Bronwyn
28 days agoRachael
29 days agoJamal
6 days agoWillard
16 days agoThomasena
20 days agoLatrice
1 months agoOra
1 months agoNettie
13 days agoBobbye
23 days agoGeraldine
1 months agoWendell
1 months agoJolanda
1 months agoReuben
30 days agoKristal
1 months agoAmos
1 months agoDortha
2 months agoCarlene
12 days agoSarah
30 days agoLeigha
1 months agoDenna
1 months ago