BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam ANS-C01 Topic 6 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 6
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

A Network Engineer is provisioning a subnet for a load balancer that will sit in front of a fleet of application servers in a private subnet. There is limited IP space left in the VPC CIDR. The application has few users now but is expected to grow quickly to millions of users.

What design will use the LEAST amount of IP space, while allowing for this growth?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Chantay
22 days ago
Option C all the way! Two /28 subnets for the Network Load Balancer is the clear winner here. I mean, who needs a ton of IP space when you can just 'network' your way through the problem? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
Deandrea
12 days ago
I think option C is the best choice too. It's efficient and allows for future growth.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janine
24 days ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm torn between options C and D. Both seem like viable solutions, but I'm leaning towards C since the /28 subnets will give us more flexibility in the long run. Although, I do have to admit, the idea of an 'Application Load Balancer' working out its gains at the gym is pretty amusing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
28 days ago
I'd go with option B. A single /29 subnet for the Network Load Balancer now, and adding a new VPC CIDR later for future growth seems like a prudent and efficient approach. Plus, who doesn't love a good 'Network Load Balancer' pun?
upvoted 0 times
Florinda
3 days ago
Definitely, it's a practical solution that will scale well as the application grows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
9 days ago
Agreed, using one /29 subnet for the Network Load Balancer now and adding another VPC CIDR later is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
16 days ago
I think option B is the way to go. It allows for future growth without wasting too much IP space.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devorah
2 months ago
I see your point, Moon. But I think option C is the most efficient with two /28 subnets for a Network Load Balancer in different Availability Zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is better as it allows for future growth by adding another VPC CIDR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
2 months ago
Hmm, option C looks like the way to go. Two /28 subnets for the Network Load Balancer should give us plenty of room to grow without wasting IP space. I'm impressed by your foresight, fellow engineer!
upvoted 0 times
Carey
13 days ago
Great minds think alike! Option C is the way to go for optimizing IP space and preparing for future expansion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
24 days ago
Definitely, using two /28 subnets for the Network Load Balancer is a smart way to plan for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
25 days ago
I agree, option C is the most efficient use of IP space while still accommodating the expected growth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
1 months ago
Option C seems like the best choice. Two /28 subnets for the Network Load Balancer will allow for future growth.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Johnna
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it uses the least amount of IP space.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel