Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon Exam ANS-C01 Topic 5 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 5
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

A company is developing an application in which IoT devices will report measurements to the AWS Cloud. The application will have millions of end users. The company observes that the IoT devices cannot support DNS resolution. The company needs to implement an Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling solution so that the IoT devices can connect to an application endpoint without using DNS.

Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

AWS Global Accelerator can provide static IP addresses that the IoT devices can connect to without using DNS2.It can also route traffic over the AWS global network and improve performance and availability for the IoT devices2.An NLB can provide end-to-end encryption for HTTPS traffic by using TLS as a target group protocol and terminating SSL connections at the load balancer level1.An NLB can also support session affinity (sticky sessions) with TCP connections1.


by Jesusita at Sep 18, 2024, 10:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ANS-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Fredric
2 months ago
Alright, let's get serious here. Option C is the way to go - NLB and Auto Scaling group. Simple, effective, and cost-conscious. Nailed it!
upvoted 0 times
Pok
9 days ago
Great, let's go with option C then. Thanks for the input!
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
16 days ago
It's definitely a cost-effective solution that meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
17 days ago
Yeah, using a Network Load Balancer with Auto Scaling group makes sense for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
1 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most straightforward choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pilar
2 months ago
Haha, maybe they should just tell the IoT devices to 'figure it out' and connect to the load balancer. No DNS? No problem!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
2 months ago
Hmm, I don't know. The Global Accelerator might add some extra performance benefits. But you're right, it's probably overkill for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
Vince
22 days ago
C: The Global Accelerator might be overkill for this scenario. Let's go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
25 days ago
B: Yeah, using an ALB-type target group for a NLB sounds like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
1 months ago
A: I think option A might be the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
1 months ago
C: I agree, setting up the IoT devices to connect to the IP addresses of the NLB should work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
1 months ago
B: Yeah, using an ALB-type target group for a NLB seems like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
2 months ago
A: I think option A might be the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ramonita
2 months ago
That's a good point, the Global Accelerator could provide better performance for the IoT devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is better because of the AWS Global Accelerator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
2 months ago
I'm with Lenora on this one. Option C seems like the way to go - keep it simple with the Network Load Balancer and Auto Scaling group.
upvoted 0 times
Art
2 months ago
True, but it might also be more expensive. Option C could be the most cost-effective choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
2 months ago
But what about option D with the Global Accelerator? It might offer better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
2 months ago
I agree with you, option C does seem like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ramonita
3 months ago
I think option A is the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
3 months ago
Option C looks like the most straightforward and cost-effective solution here. No need for the extra complexity of the Global Accelerator.
upvoted 0 times
Felicitas
2 months ago
Yeah, option C is simple and cost-effective. No need for the extra features of the Global Accelerator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
2 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel