Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon Exam ANS-C01 Topic 2 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 2
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

A company is deploying third-party firewall appliances for traffic inspection and NAT capabilities in its VPC. The VPC is configured with private subnets and public subnets. The company needs to deploy the firewall appliances behind a load balancer.

Which architecture will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Lenna at Nov 24, 2023, 09:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ANS-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Francis
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D. The Network Load Balancer paired with the dual-NIC firewall appliances seems like a solid architecture. Plus, using the NAT functionality on the firewall appliances could be more efficient than relying on a separate NAT gateway. Although, the cost-effectiveness aspect is still a bit unclear to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option A with the NAT gateway might be a bit simpler and potentially more cost-effective. But then again, the dual-NIC approach in option B could provide better performance and scalability. This is a tough one, I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
11 months ago
I agree, option B looks like the best choice here. Having the firewall appliances with two network interfaces, one in the private subnet and one in the public subnet, allows for more control and flexibility in terms of traffic routing and NAT. The Gateway Load Balancer also seems like the appropriate choice for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
11 months ago
This question seems to be testing our understanding of AWS networking and load balancing concepts. I'm not sure which option is the most cost-effective, but I'm leaning towards option B. The use of a Gateway Load Balancer and the dual-NIC configuration for the firewall appliances seems like a more robust and flexible solution.
upvoted 0 times
Serina
10 months ago
Definitely. We want to ensure our network is secure and efficiently configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
10 months ago
Agreed. It's important to consider both cost-effectiveness and functionality when choosing the architecture for deploying third-party firewall appliances in a VPC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
10 months ago
That makes sense. Option B with the Gateway Load Balancer and dual-NIC configuration does seem like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
10 months ago
I believe the Network Load Balancer is not as suitable for this scenario. It may not offer the same level of traffic inspection and NAT capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
10 months ago
What about the use of a Network Load Balancer instead? Would that be a better option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
10 months ago
Using a Gateway Load Balancer with the firewall appliances as targets seems like a solid approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
10 months ago
I think option B is the best choice as well. It provides more flexibility with the dual-NIC configuration for the firewall appliances.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel