Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon Exam ANS-C01 Topic 1 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 1
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

A company is running business applications on AWS. The company uses 50 AWS accounts, thousands of VPCs. and 3 AWS Regions across the United States and Europe.

A network engineer needs to establish network connectivity between an on-premises data center and the Regions. The network engineer also must establish connectivity between the VPCs. On-premises users and applications must be able to connect to applications that run in the VPCs.

The company has an existing AWS Direct Connect connection that the network engineer can use. The network engineer creates a transit gateway in each Region and configures the transit gateways as inter-Region peers.

Which solution will provide network connectivity from the on-premises data center to the Regions and will provide inter-VPC communications across the different Regions?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Arlean at Feb 11, 2025, 11:55 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ANS-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Margery
29 days ago
Well, if we're going for the most 'transit'-ional solution, I'd have to go with C. Get that Direct Connect gateway and transit VIF working together, you know? Smooth sailing from there on out!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards B. Creating a private VIF to a new Direct Connect gateway and associating it with the VPCs seems like a cleaner approach than the transit gateway option.
upvoted 0 times
Carlee
10 days ago
I agree, setting up a private VIF to a new Direct Connect gateway seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
20 days ago
I think B is the way to go. It's simpler and more direct.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jannette
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D because it seems like a more secure option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
2 months ago
D seems like the most straightforward solution. Using a public VIF for the Site-to-Site VPN connection and attaching it to the transit gateways should provide the connectivity we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the most suitable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
2 months ago
Option C looks promising, but I'm a bit concerned about the complexity of configuring the transit VIF and the Direct Connect gateway. Seems like a lot of moving parts.
upvoted 0 times
Christene
27 days ago
That's a good point. Option A could be a more straightforward solution to ensure network connectivity without too many moving parts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
29 days ago
What about Option A? Creating a private VIF with a virtual private gateway seems straightforward and might be easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
1 months ago
Yeah, setting up the transit VIF and Direct Connect gateway might be a bit tricky. Maybe there's a simpler option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alayna
1 months ago
Option C does seem like a good solution for the network connectivity, but I understand your concern about the complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
German
2 months ago
I think option A is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel