Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Alibaba Exam ACA-Developer Topic 7 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for Alibaba's ACA-Developer exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 7
[All ACA-Developer Questions]

When versioning is enabled for an OSS Bucket, previous versions of objects will be retained, using storage space and incurring additional costs. How can you save space and reduce costs, while retaining some of the benefits of object versioning?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Nickole at May 22, 2024, 06:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ACA-Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Felicitas
5 months ago
Haha, Option A - the classic 'bury your head in the sand' approach. I'll take the automated lifecycle management of Option C any day!
upvoted 0 times
Carole
4 months ago
Automated lifecycle management with Option C is the way to go for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
4 months ago
Option C sounds like a much more efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
5 months ago
I agree, Option A is definitely not the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herman
5 months ago
Roxanne, you make a fair point, but I'd be worried about losing important data by turning off versioning completely. Option C is the way to go in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Sherell
4 months ago
I think using lifecycle management to automatically delete old versions is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
5 months ago
Option C sounds like a good compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
5 months ago
I agree, turning off versioning completely is risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roxanne
5 months ago
Why not just avoid versioning altogether? Option A seems like the easiest way to save space and money, no?
upvoted 0 times
Yesenia
4 months ago
User B
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
4 months ago
User A
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
4 months ago
Using OSS's built in lifecycle management capabilities to automatically delete old versions of objects after a set time can also help save space and reduce costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
4 months ago
Avoid using version management.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bong
5 months ago
I agree with Denae. Option C seems the most efficient and cost-effective way to handle versioning without sacrificing the benefits.
upvoted 0 times
Queenie
5 months ago
I think Option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mayra
5 months ago
I agree, using lifecycle management to automatically delete old versions is a smart way to save space and reduce costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denae
5 months ago
Option C sounds like the best solution to me. Automating the deletion of old object versions is a smart way to manage storage costs.
upvoted 0 times
Candra
5 months ago
I agree, using OSS's built-in lifecycle management to automatically delete old versions after a set time is efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
5 months ago
C sounds like the best solution to me. Automating the deletion of old object versions is a smart way to manage storage costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel