I don't think so, option C seems accurate to me. I'm leaning towards option E) ApsaraDB for PolarDB is designed to handle large amounts of sequential queries
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) An ApsaraDB for PolarDB cluster can also be scaled out to a maximum of 16 nodes, and provide up to 6 times of performance improvement traditional MySQL clusters at a 30% to 50% cost reduction
I think the correct answer is B) Each ApsaraDB for PolarDB cluster supports up to 100 TB of storage space and can handle up to one million queries per second (QPS)
Launa
5 months agoEladia
5 months agoDenny
5 months agoChi
5 months agoEladia
5 months agoQuentin
5 months agoJulieta
6 months agoMalcom
6 months agoJulieta
6 months agoAdelle
7 months agoMarilynn
7 months agoTamar
7 months agoCordell
7 months agoMaybelle
7 months agoTwana
7 months agoMakeda
5 months agoYaeko
5 months agoLuisa
5 months ago