I don't think so, option C seems accurate to me. I'm leaning towards option E) ApsaraDB for PolarDB is designed to handle large amounts of sequential queries
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) An ApsaraDB for PolarDB cluster can also be scaled out to a maximum of 16 nodes, and provide up to 6 times of performance improvement traditional MySQL clusters at a 30% to 50% cost reduction
I think the correct answer is B) Each ApsaraDB for PolarDB cluster supports up to 100 TB of storage space and can handle up to one million queries per second (QPS)
Launa
10 months agoEladia
10 months agoDenny
10 months agoChi
10 months agoEladia
10 months agoQuentin
10 months agoJulieta
10 months agoMalcom
10 months agoJulieta
11 months agoAdelle
12 months agoMarilynn
12 months agoTamar
12 months agoCordell
12 months agoMaybelle
12 months agoTwana
12 months agoMakeda
10 months agoYaeko
10 months agoLuisa
10 months ago