BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA Exam CPA-Financial Topic 2 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Financial exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 2
[All CPA-Financial Questions]

On January 2, 1993, Quo, Inc. hired Reed to be its controller. During the year, Reed, working closely with Quo's president and outside accountants, made changes in accounting policies, corrected several errors dating from 1992 and before, and instituted new accounting policies.

Quo's 1993 financial statements will be presented in comparative form with its 1992 financial statements.

This question represents one of Quo's transactions. List B represents the general accounting treatment required for these transactions. These treatments are:

* Cumulative effect approach - Include the cumulative effect of the adjustment resulting from the accounting change or error correction in the 1993 financial statements, and do not restate the 1992 financial statements.

* Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach - Restate the 1992 financial statements and adjust 1992 beginning retained earnings if the error or change affects a period prior to 1992.

* Prospective approach - Report 1993 and future financial statements on the new basis but do not restate 1992 financial statements.

Item to Be Answered

As a result of a production breakthrough, Quo determined that manufacturing equipment previously depreciated over 15 years should be depreciated over 20 years.

List B (Select one)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Choice 'C' is correct. This affects only the prospective (current and subsequent) periods - not prior periods, not retained earnings.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Glory
5 months ago
I believe that the adjustment should be included in the 1993 financial statements without restating the 1992 financial statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
5 months ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
I disagree, I think the answer is A) Cumulative effect approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
5 months ago
Because the production breakthrough affects previous periods, so the 1992 financial statements need to be restated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
5 months ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
5 months ago
I think the correct answer is B) Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
6 months ago
I understand your point, Reena. However, I think option C) Prospective approach might be more appropriate in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
6 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to adjust the 1992 financial statements if the error affects a period prior to 1992?
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B) Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
7 months ago
I think we should choose option A) Cumulative effect approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel