Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA Exam CPA-Financial Topic 2 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Financial exam
Question #: 105
Topic #: 2
[All CPA-Financial Questions]

On January 2, 1993, Quo, Inc. hired Reed to be its controller. During the year, Reed, working closely with Quo's president and outside accountants, made changes in accounting policies, corrected several errors dating from 1992 and before, and instituted new accounting policies.

Quo's 1993 financial statements will be presented in comparative form with its 1992 financial statements.

This question represents one of Quo's transactions. List B represents the general accounting treatment required for these transactions. These treatments are:

* Cumulative effect approach - Include the cumulative effect of the adjustment resulting from the accounting change or error correction in the 1993 financial statements, and do not restate the 1992 financial statements.

* Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach - Restate the 1992 financial statements and adjust 1992 beginning retained earnings if the error or change affects a period prior to 1992.

* Prospective approach - Report 1993 and future financial statements on the new basis but do not restate 1992 financial statements.

Item to Be Answered

Quo sells extended service contracts on its products. Because related services are performed over several years, in 1993 Quo changed from the cash method to the accrual method of recognizing income from these service contracts.

List B (Select one)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Choice 'B' is correct. If comparative FS are issued, restate prior year's FS. If comparative FS are not issued, restate prior year-end's retained earnings account by 'adjusting' (net of tax) the opening balance of the current retained earnings statement. Note that when an error is corrected, retroactive restatement is used, and when there is a change in accounting principle, retrospective restatement is done. However, this is only a difference in terminology.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Willodean
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be A) Cumulative effect approach. They should include the adjustment in the 1993 financial statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
2 months ago
Haha, Quo must have had quite the messy books before Reed came in and cleaned things up. I bet the outside accountants were sweating bullets trying to figure out all those errors!
upvoted 0 times
Harris
1 months ago
B) Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
2 months ago
A) Cumulative effect approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alline
2 months ago
I agree with Delsie. Quo changed their accounting method, so they should restate the 1992 financial statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Artie
2 months ago
Hmm, the wording about 'correcting several errors dating from 1992 and before' makes me wonder if the retroactive approach might apply. But I think the cumulative effect is the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
Margurite
2 months ago
I think the retroactive restatement approach might be necessary considering the errors dating back to 1992.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
2 months ago
I agree, the cumulative effect approach seems like the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marisha
2 months ago
I agree, the cumulative effect approach is the way to go. Quo shouldn't have to restate their 1992 financials just because they changed their policy in 1993.
upvoted 0 times
Twana
2 months ago
User 3: Definitely, Quo can move forward with the new policy without having to redo past financial statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, it makes sense to include the adjustment in the 1993 financial statements without restating 1992.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
2 months ago
User 1: I think the cumulative effect approach is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delsie
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
3 months ago
The cumulative effect approach makes the most sense here since Quo changed their accounting policy for service contracts, not correcting an error from a previous year.
upvoted 0 times
Reena
2 months ago
Yes, the cumulative effect approach will show the impact of the change in the 1993 financial statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
2 months ago
Yes, it seems like the most appropriate choice given the circumstances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
2 months ago
It's important to accurately reflect the change in accounting policy for the service contracts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
2 months ago
I agree, the cumulative effect approach is the best option for Quo in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
2 months ago
I agree, the cumulative effect approach is the best option for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
2 months ago
A) Cumulative effect approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
2 months ago
A) Cumulative effect approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel