BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA Exam CPA-Financial Topic 1 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Financial exam
Question #: 102
Topic #: 1
[All CPA-Financial Questions]

On January 2, 1993, Quo, Inc. hired Reed to be its controller. During the year, Reed, working closely with Quo's president and outside accountants, made changes in accounting policies, corrected several errors dating from 1992 and before, and instituted new accounting policies.

Quo's 1993 financial statements will be presented in comparative form with its 1992 financial statements.

This question represents one of Quo's transactions. List B represents the general accounting treatment required for these transactions. These treatments are:

* Cumulative effect approach - Include the cumulative effect of the adjustment resulting from the accounting change or error correction in the 1993 financial statements, and do not restate the 1992 financial statements.

* Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach - Restate the 1992 financial statements and adjust 1992 beginning retained earnings if the error or change affects a period prior to 1992.

* Prospective approach - Report 1993 and future financial statements on the new basis but do not restate 1992 financial statements.

Item to Be Answered

During 1993, Quo determined that an insurance premium paid and entirely expensed in 1992 was for the period January 1, 1992, through January 1, 1994.

List B (Select one)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Choice 'B' is correct. If comparative FS are issued, restate prior year's FS. If comparative FS are not issued, restate prior year-end's retained earnings account by 'adjusting' (net of tax) the opening balance of the current retained earnings statement.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Cathrine
16 hours ago
Wait, so we're dealing with an insurance premium that covers two years? That's a tricky one. I guess the cumulative effect approach might be the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
5 days ago
Hmm, this seems pretty straightforward. I think the retroactive or retrospective restatement approach is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
19 days ago
I agree with Margarita. The error affects a period prior to 1992, so restating the 1992 financial statements is necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
26 days ago
I think the correct answer is B) Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel